English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

♣what solutions are there to putting CO 2 gases in the air and other pollutants♣

2007-01-28 01:59:36 · 2 answers · asked by ThePr0phet0x33 1 in Environment

2 answers

Mans contribution to atmospheric Co2 is very minimal and not reversible. when I was a little kid in grade school (back before Independence) they taught we were just coming out of an ice age, and the glacial melt caused the Great Lakes... then in high-school (shortly before electricity) they taught that very same thing... now Voila... we have... 50 years later an all new and improved reason for the warming... (groan) Global warming IS happening, a given, but not for the reasons our leftist liberal science sources, politicians and socialist press are reporting. The majority of scientific studies are now discounting Carbon Dioxide emitted by motor vehicles (burning of fossil fuels for our basic energy requirements) as the cause. Geological history indicates natural solar cycles are the culprit, something politicians have no power over so they tend to ignore. The real short-term danger is in fact a buildup of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, but not the buildup of Carbon Dioxide. The real culprit is Methane, a far more potent greenhouse gas, being released into the atmosphere by the (natural) decay of Methane Hydrate occurring (naturally) frozen on the ocean floors, due to the gradual (natural) warming of ocean water by (natural) solar cycles, another item our politicians have no control over and the liberal media will never mention. Follow the money trail... They promote revenue and power by promoting fear. "We just have to do SOMETHING...You know"? So they continue to promote cars as the culprit, people and cars… which do we get rid of first?, (sound like something from the Pol Pot generation?)
There is a natural cyclic Co2 increase due to solar cycles, plus the natural atmospheric Co2 exchange due to photosynthesis (natural plant biology). Man’s contribution to the (new) atmospheric Co2 increase has been estimated at less than 10%. If you do the math, a world wide reduction of fossil fuel use of 10 % would do absolutely nothing to ward off the natural warming cycle, and plunge the world economy in to absolute chaos, causing mass starvation and civil unrest. Who wants to be the first to push THAT button??? The liberals just want an excuse to raise taxes and legislate more control over peoples lives.

2007-01-28 02:26:41 · answer #1 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 0 0

The CO2 problem will go away when oil and coal run out. Oil may run out in a hundred years or so, but coal will not. And burning coal releases much more CO2 than burning oil does. Nuclear power could supply quite a bit of our power (France gets 75% of its electricity from nuclear reactors), but things like wind and solar are just too weak to replace all those coal and nuclear generating plants. Hydroelectric (dams) is already fully developed. And what about cars, trucks and airplanes? So unless we are willing to live like the Amish (we being the whole world, China, India, Iran, North Korea, and EVERYONE in the world), I don't see much hope of reducing CO2 emissions any time soon.

2007-01-28 02:12:19 · answer #2 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers