English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

refusing to fight in what is seen by many as an unjust war?

2007-01-28 01:43:04 · 26 answers · asked by bumpocooper 5 in Politics & Government Military

26 answers

I agree with most of these people here. No one held a gun to their heads and made them take the oath of enlistment. They did so volunteerly. Some of them even went awol after they signed up after 9/11. I mean come on, you didn't think that after that day, that the US wouldn't eventually go to war. Have some common sense.

Yes, I would say they are cowards and traitors. DO they not realize how many soldiers, arimen, marines and saliors are over there fighting in Iraq and Afganistan who are totally agaisnt what they are doing but are doing so because of the oath they took. Then if they don't like it, then they will get out after thier enlistment is over.

2007-01-28 06:54:53 · answer #1 · answered by ckamk1995 6 · 2 1

As an Iraqi conflict vet i will regrettably inform you which you have been grossly misinformed. Air strikes are very useful, precise and basically used in specific circumstances. Raids placed us at a lots greater threat to be a casualty and regrettably that's how we carry out maximum of our missions. i might advise you detect a clean source of concepts. in case you utilize the media that's a extensive mistake. occasion, the Iraqi people, for the main area love us and what we are doing there. I surely have some photos of the locals giving us hugs and intense 5's. The media leads you to have faith in any different case, in maximum circumstances. additionally the civilian deaths brought about by utilising the U. S. are so very minimum. conflict is hell and death is the effect while you're harmless or a combatant. you shouldn't even evaluate WW2 to Operation Iraqi Freedom, it is not EVEN A conflict! 2 distinctive battles, strategies, much less worldwide places and individuals in contact, international domination no longer in play and distinctive technologies. For you being a self proclaimed, historian, i'm surprised at how unintelligent you come back in the time of. For the calling me a coward area, why do no longer you grab an M-sixteen, flow over there and instruct us all how that is executed! once you're making it lower back in a million piece i'm going to call you a coward after which you will tell me the way you sense. God Bless

2016-11-01 12:11:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Their is no draft, so every American soldier is a volunteer. Every American soldier takes an oath of their own free will. A soldier that flees the battle field or cowers when they should fight is a coward. A soldier that flees the country when called upon to fulfill a given oath is a traitor. When time were good they cashed there paycheck and spent the money. When called upon to earn that pay and fulfill the promise they made then they run away. Traitors, and criminals. If Canada wants them let them keep them they should be stripped of their citizen ship and forced to repay the American people the money they own them for the pay, training, and benefits they cashed under false pretenses.

2007-01-28 03:20:38 · answer #3 · answered by DeSaxe 6 · 2 0

I feel sick to my stomach that one might even consider to call these low lifes heros!

I don't know if they are cowards. For some personal reason they decided not to go and ran and hid from prosecution. That at least takes some courage.

But lets look at this. THEY VOLUNTEERED to join the military. What happens to their comrads who now had to go into combat short someone who they trained with and built a team with? They have put their comrads into harms way for their own personal reasons.

A soldier cannot pick and chose... They can refuse an obviously illegal order and that is it. Don't like that.. don't join up.

I say if Canada will not send them back, our government should revoke their citizenship! Period. Done, never allow them to reenter the country. Cowards, maybe... Traitors heck yes !!!

2007-01-28 02:35:07 · answer #4 · answered by shovelkicker 5 · 5 0

I feel that the military should be and is voluntary but if you join the military you are in the military. Personally, I would do anything for Bush in the military because he would do what is right. I would not serve under Clinton or any other Liberal because he/they wouldn't be there for me and he/they would make my sacrifice to the people of the USA meaningless. Deserters? Every war has it's cowards. The truth is not alot fled in this perfectly legal and just war!

2007-01-28 01:53:46 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 4 0

yes they are cowards, what the heck did they join the military for anyway then sissy, l would be ashamed to call them my american friends. my husband, his 4 brothers and father r over there and my brother leaves in 2 weeks with a baby on the way. l have not seen my husband in yrs, though l cannot say what he does but lets just say he works for the state and he lives within the community of the iraqy people. tina

2007-01-28 02:03:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

At this point just plain stupid!! Seeing as a draft hasn't gone into effect therefore there would be no need to flee from the Iraq war. Now if they signed the paper because they wanted to then decided they weren't going to fight and go to Canada instead then they are cowards. There was no law stating they had to sign the papers!

2007-01-28 02:01:44 · answer #7 · answered by wondermom 6 · 4 1

i would call them cowards. They caused a breech of contract that they signed saying that they would go to war if need be the case. ( I'm not fully allowed to say to much under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, but we are called brothers in arms for a reason, they just stabbed their brothers in the back.!) Traitors

2007-01-28 03:08:52 · answer #8 · answered by matt f 2 · 2 0

It is a decision you make when you sign up- there is no draft. I would like to see our guys and gals home but a traitor is a traitor. Rules are rules. They didn't have to sign up-very simple. Just another example of not taking responsibllity for your actions-esp without a draft. Vietnam was a bit different I agree but not now. If you disagree, then don't go in, because it was bound to happen somewhere!

2007-01-28 03:37:52 · answer #9 · answered by ARTmom 7 · 2 0

I wouldn't call them cowards. That implies fear.
The word traitor implies that they traded themselves in to go to the enemy. They are law breaking citizens who backed out of both a physical and emotional commitment to this country. Maybe there is a word for that, but I don't think coward or traitor is it.

2007-01-28 01:55:30 · answer #10 · answered by ME 4 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers