I feel they should especially if there is more than one child being affected by this absenteesim Father and years have proven he has no intention in supporting this child or children what do you think ? What would you do ?
Vasectomy Main Entry: va·sec·to·my
Function: noun
Pronunciation: -t&-me
Inflected Form(s): plural -mies
Etymology: International Scientific Vocabulary
: surgical division or resection of all or part of the vas deferens usually to induce sterility
2007-01-27 21:35:40 · 17 answers · asked by Chi-Girli 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Mr Froggy 2 you my dear friend Banish the ideal that this comment or question was solely created to you ill admit on one hand the perplexity of the ideal is harsh but keep in mind if the shoe fits this is not intended for likeminded good fathers such as yourself God Bless and may you not speak so candidly about her mother your child may be watching hmmmmm be positive not defensive not all woman are like this
2007-01-27 22:53:42 · update #1
They still wouldn't pay.I am raising my son he is 11 never seen his biological sperm giver.My wife and I were split up for about 9 mos. and she got pregnant by this dude she should have used protection ,but whats done is done.I have him now on my own because my wife passed away recently and there is no way I would give him up to his dead beat sperm Donner.He has paid 20$ in support in 11 ,well in May it will be 12 yrs.A friend told me he is on the run from the law for child support of other children.I don't want his money but he will never see this boy either unless when he becomes of age and wishes to find him.Actually he has told me he has no desire to see him,which is cool I am Dad and he knows it.I love him the same as my other son and he knows that but I agree if you can't take responsibility for your actions snip em.
2007-01-27 21:53:06 · answer #1 · answered by one10soldier 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The law has, quite rightly, been extremely squeamish
about performing "final" operations on people for
their crimes.
The most obvious case, of course, is the death
penalty, which, being irreversible, has caused
considerable controversy whenever someone
ends up on death row that turns out to not have
committed the crime.
Mandatory sterilization is only useful if the bad
guy cannot undo it himself.
I am assuming that you are not being sexist and
that you would also apply the appropriate remedy
to women who leave their children and skip out
on the fathers.
Do you really want the state to be able to tell
women when they can reproduce? If you can
have a woman sterilized for non-payment of
child care, how about for *BAD* child care?
That is, neglect, etc.
We're getting into a very tricky legal thicket
here: Should the state have the ability to
determine whether or not a person can
reproduce?
Legal precedent has said "no", even though
with welfare payments, medical care for
persons who cannot afford it, etc., the state
has an extremely vested interest in the issue.
Indeed, you can imagine a society which didn't
allow you to reproduce unless you went through
an application process with the state, perhaps
similar to getting a marriage license.
Perhaps getting such a license might required
a whole lot more - like paying people off, or
being white.
Nope, this is not a road you want to travel down.
2007-01-27 21:44:52 · answer #2 · answered by Elana 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Vasectomy Pronunciation
2016-11-07 11:14:43 · answer #3 · answered by xochitl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
And what about dads who lose their kids because Mom decides to move out of the community then vanishes with them?
Or the Dads that are disabled and cant go see their kids.
Why not just butcher every father that misses their kids but cant contact them? Lets just shoot them. Get rid of their pain too.
When it comes to kids, women have all the rights and all the damn answers. Don't you?
I have a daughter I have not seen in four years because her mother is a hateful spiteful antichrist. Do I deserve to be cut because neither me or the court can find her????????
Not all absenteeism is our fault. And Butchery is no answer.
Have you got any idea how painful it is, NOT to see your child?
I miss my baby! God you women suck!
The more I think of this question the angrier I get. I don't even know my baby girl anymore. I have no idea what she looks like now! I feel guilty for every single minute I miss in her life and I cant even find her! I pay my child support to the state and the damn checks cant be delivered.
You women are nothing but dangerous. We fall in love with you and you trash us then you have to threaten what little manhood you don't take away in the marriage.
I don't want a wife, I don't need a wife. I want my child back!
2007-01-27 22:10:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. The courts are still more prone to award custody to a woman than a man. Until that injustice is fixed any such punishment should be awarded [if at all] to the man for his actions AND the woman for getting pregnant.
2007-01-28 00:59:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have a father who has never really supported me or my sisters. But I do not think they should make a law that mandates a vasectomy. That is like trying to say that women who keep having babies should be forced to get her tubes tied. That is like harsh population control and never should the government have that right.
2007-01-28 00:35:01 · answer #6 · answered by Saphira 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely NOT!!. Hitler suggested that anyone that the Nazi regime deemed mentaly unfit or undesirable be sterilized, not paying child support is a morally and legally wrong, but serialization is a bit extreme.
2007-01-28 23:14:08 · answer #7 · answered by watchman_1900 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, AND 10 to 15 percent of all children don't know who their real bio father is. That means one in 10 children are born to a mother who lies to the child about who his Dad is. Lets sterilize those women too.
2007-01-27 21:46:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Castration is probably the best answer. Most likely carried out in the town square in public.
2007-01-27 21:45:18 · answer #9 · answered by Henry 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Personally I think we depend too much on government regulation to cure the ills of our society. We have plenty of laws. What we need is for people to start accepting their responsibility to one another. "That will never happen" you say. Sad, isn't it?
2007-01-28 00:42:37 · answer #10 · answered by rico3151 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋