English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

jsus is not god son and jsus is not god cos he himself used to worship god.god is one and jsus and holy ghost are not gods...how can u say tht u ppl better have research on it to find out the truth cos bible keep on changing ditions and wat ever pope think is good he write in it ..u shuld check out the reall thing

2007-01-27 18:07:39 · 25 answers · asked by hassanscence 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

25 answers

Did you sleep well?

2007-01-27 18:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by Naughty Boy 2 · 1 4

you right
Jesus is a great prophet and i believe in him and love him very much ... Allah is Allah .... i wish like u if we get read and read to find out the Truth ... it is logic what u r saying .
i wish u make a sound here ..

What about the Bible? Who actually wrote it?

What was the original language of the Bible? (Hebrew? Aramaic? Koine Greek?)
NOTE: - The Bible was never in English during the time of any prophet (not even Muhammad) - because English did not exist until after 1066 AD!

Does the Bible exist in the original form anywhere on earth? (No)

Why does the Catholic Bible has seven (7) more books than the Protestant Bible?

Why do these two Bibles have different versions of the same books?

Why are there so many mistakes and errors are from the very first verse right up to the very last verse?

Why do 'Born Again Christians' teach concepts that are not from the Bible?

There is no word "Trinity" in the Bible in any version of any language

The oldest forms of Christianity do not support the 'born again' beliefs

Jesus of the English Bible complains about the 'crucifixion'
("Eli! Eli! Lama sabachthani? - My God! My God! Why have You forsaken me?") [Mk 15:34]

How can Jesus be the "Only Begotten Son" of John 3:16? When in Psalms 2:7 David is God's "Begotten Son?"

Would a 'Just' God, a 'Fair' God, a 'Loving' God -- punish Jesus for the sins of the people that he called to follow him?

What happens to people who died before Jesus came?

What happens to those who never hear this message?

What about innocent children who die although their parents are not Christian?

Didn't God create Adam from dirt? -- So, why does he need Mary to make Jesus?

And what about God?
How can God create Himself?
How can God be a man?
How can a man be a God?
How can God have a son?
The Bible says "Seth (is) the son of Adam" and that"Adam is the son of God." [Lk 3:36]
Can't God just forgive us and not have to kill Jesus?
And what about Jesus?
Jesus did not even carry the cross -- Simon Cyre'ne, a passerby did! [Mk 15:21]
Jesus of the Bible was NOT on the cross for longer than six (6) hours -- NOT three days -- (from the 3rd to the 9th hour) [Mk 15:25 & 15:33]
Jesus of the Bible did not spend three days and nights in the tomb -- Friday night - until Sunday before dawn -- is not 3 days and nights!
Jesus DID NOT claim to be God - or even equal to God!

Muslim

2007-01-27 18:41:22 · answer #2 · answered by Rose2006 2 · 0 0

Ok this is a hard topic. Jesus being the Son of God appears many times in the bible. One of the first verses we learn if John 3:16 For God so loved the world that He sent His only begotten SON that whosoever believes in Him will not perish but have everlasting life. And when Jesus is baptised God says this is my Son in whom I am well pleased. So how do we look at the Trinity. Jesus is part of God. He is the Son. He is our intersessor. We do not worship Him or pray to Him. We praise Him, we are thankful for Him. We pray to God through Him. Without Jesus we would not be able to know God. The Holy Spirit is also part of God. It is the spirit of God that comes to us upon becoming believers. It replaced Christ on earth after His ascention. We do not worship it or pray to it, but we do not speak against it either. It is Holy and is to be praised. The bible does not change. The liguistics of it might change from on version to another but the meaning does not. Put NKJ up against a NASB, an NIV, and the Message. All of them will have a different reading level, but all say the same thing. The pope does not have the power to change the bible, in fact I would bet that if you look into it you would see that he is not sending notes to the printers to change the bible. He may chose to focus on a verse and misinterpret it, but he does not get to change it. The catholic bible does have books in it that the others do not and that is over the Apocrapha books. Many Christian faiths see these as books written by the followers of Christ in their own words. Not inspired by God through the Holy Sprirt. In fact I believe Macabees even says it is not inspired. So they are not part of our bible.
Here are some things for you to look up.
John 1:1-5
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He[1][Lit This one ] was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.
4 In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men.
5 The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend[2][Or overpower ] it.

Mark 1:1
1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

2007-01-27 18:48:08 · answer #3 · answered by micheletmoore 4 · 0 0

sad

By the way if the Bible is unreliable as a source of information concerning Jesus where should one look? And have you even read the Bible or just swallowed the lies you were fed.

I would suggest that you read it for yourself. Begin with the 1st 14 verses of the Gospel of John. Use any translation, basically it will say the same thing.

John 1:1-3 (NLT)
In the beginning the Word already existed. He was with God, and he was God. [2] He was in the beginning with God. [3] He created everything there is. Nothing exists that he didn't make.

John 1:14 (NLT)
So the Word became human and lived here on earth among us. He was full of unfailing love and faithfulness. And we have seen his glory, the glory of the only Son of the Father.

2007-01-27 18:25:03 · answer #4 · answered by Tony S 2 · 0 1

alright, first of all, the Trinity (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is composed of three separate entities that are an identical substance. that's to declare that they are all styles of God, inspite of the shown fact that they are distinctive people. that is between the great mysteries of present day faith. i do no longer declare to completely comprehend it and no you could nonetheless; that is like asking why the universe exists. Plus, that is freaking God, he may well be whoever the hell he needs, who're you to tell him in any different case? As for the Bible, there are no new variations of the it. there may well be new translations or distinctive books lined, however the books themselves have been written very almost 2000 years in the past. The Pope would not rewrite the Bible. He would desire to interpret it, yet like I pronounced, it became placed on paper thousands of years in the past.

2016-11-01 11:43:11 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because that is what the Bible says...the Bible does not keep "changing editions". There are various translations of the Bible just as there are for any work. There are basically only two "editions" of the Bible, a Protestant version and a Catholic version. The Protestant version differs from the Catholic version by leaving out the Apocrypha. The Bible has remained unchanged (besides translations of course) since oh about 325 A.D. I am not Catholic but the Pope never adds anything to the Bible.

2007-01-27 18:18:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Your talking about the Christian doctrine of the trinity. What is the doctrine of the trinity? It says there is one God and 3 persons in the Godhead. This is not a logical contradiction. If I said there was only one person in the Godhead and yet at the same time 3 persons in the Godhead, that would be a contradiction. If I said there was only one God and yet 3 Gods, that would also be a contradiction. But one God and 3 persons in the Godhead is not a logical contradiction. It's certainly a mystery. I'll admit I don't understand it. We perceive things by comparing them to other things on earth. Since there is nothing to compare the Trinity to on earth, It is hard for us to understand. If I went out into the sahara desert and found a native there who had never been outside of the sahara and had no modern electronics like a radio or TV or computer and said to him " there's a beautiful water falls in america called the Niagra Falls", He might say "water falls, what's that"? But if I had a giant pitcher of water and I poured it out in front of him and said "that's what it is but only on a much larger scale", then he might understand because I was able to compare it to something else on earth to illustrate it to him. But, like I said, there is nothing on earth to compare the trinity so it is hard to understand. But just because we don't understand something, it doesn't logically follow that it isn't true. It just means we don't understand it. I don't understand how light could be in wave form and particle form at the same time. That just doesn't seem possible. Yet it is true. I don't understand how time could have physical properties but yet it does(gravity influences time). I can't picture what 6 or 8 dimensions would look like. There's a lot of things I don't understand(mostly in quantum physics) and yet they are true. If God is infinite and we are finite you would expect that there would be some things that we, with our finite minds would be unable to comprehend about an infinite being in our present state.

http://www.answering-islam.org/
http://www.islamreview.com/articles.htm
http://www.intouch.org/index_76034.html
http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/_PDFArchives/theological-dictionary/TD1W0100.pdf
http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/_PDFArchives/theological-dictionary/TD2W0100.pdf
http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/_PDFArchives/theological-dictionary/TD4W0100.pdf
http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/_PDFArchives/theological-dictionary/TD1W0200.pdf
http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/Salvation/salvation-born-again.htm
http://www.notreligion.com/
http://www.100prophecies.org/evidence.htm
http://www.aboutbibleprophecy.com/default.htm
http://www.johnankerberg.org/Articles/_PDFArchives/theological-dictionary/TD4W1003.pdf

2007-01-27 18:28:15 · answer #7 · answered by upsman 5 · 1 0

Do you believe the drivel your imam comes up with each week?
Mohammed was a poor plagarist. He didn't even get his story right. Christians take great pride in the accuracy of our Bible. We pride ourself on free thought and expression. Your culture hasn't had this since they lost what they had stolen from the Greeks. If you think the Pope could change the Bible then you are attributing powers to him that he does not have. You are deluded. Go back to your drivel, you are so unconvincing as to be laughable. Pathetically laughable even. Why does your prophet require praise that should go to God?

2007-01-27 18:16:40 · answer #8 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 0 2

You are right in saying that Jesus is not God, because he is not, but he is God's son,(John10:36)He himself said so, and God himself confirmed it!(Matthew3:16, 17)
IF it were true, that Jesus was God, it should be clearly and consistently presented in the Bible. Why? Because, as the apostles affirmed, the Bible is God's revelation of himself to mankind. And since we need to know God to worship him acceptably, the Bible should be clear in telling us just who he is.

First-century believers accepted the Scriptures as the authentic revelation of God. It was the basis for their beliefs, the final authority. For example, when the apostle Paul preached to people in the city of Beroea, "they received the word with the greatest eagerness of mind, carefully examining the Scriptures daily as to whether these things were so."-Acts 17:10, 11.

What did prominent men of God at that time use as their authority? Acts 17:2, 3 tells us: "According to Paul's custom . . . he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, explaining and proving by references [from the Scriptures]."

Jesus himself set the example in using the Scriptures as the basis for his teaching, repeatedly saying: "It is written." "He interpreted to them things pertaining to himself in all the Scriptures."-Matthew 4:4, 7; Luke 24:27.

Thus Jesus, Paul, and first-century believers used the Scriptures as the foundation for their teaching. They knew that "all Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work."-2 Timothy 3:16, 17; see also 1 Corinthians 4:6; 1 Thessalonians 2:13; 2 Peter 1:20, 21.

Since the Bible can 'set things straight,' it should clearly reveal it to be so.But it does not! but though it does show over and over again that Jesus was God's Son and given the authority from his God and father!

2007-01-27 20:31:32 · answer #9 · answered by I speak Truth 6 · 0 0

Dear kind sir, I'm sure you mean well with this question/statement. But what you fail to understand is that you can read the Bible non-stop for the next 20 years, but unless you have accepted Christ you will never fully comprehend what is written. One of the first things you should know is that the word of God is really hidden from the world, and that's scriptural.

2007-01-27 18:20:23 · answer #10 · answered by Heaven's Messenger 6 · 2 2

You got a lot a guts Hassansce. Is that how ya say it? Hassansce. With that kind a name, yer probably one a those crazy middle eastern fellers ain't ya. You ride in on a Camel? And by the tone a them words ya go goin on there I bet yer wired and ready to blow!! WHOOOEEE!! HOT DAM!! Git down everybody, we got ourselves a cyberspace bomber!! Holy akba!!, Quick Lucy, Git my anti virus.......We got one a them crazy Camel jockies fix'n a start all out Holy Jihad in cyberspace. Shhhooot. This is what I live for. Come on les go..........

2007-01-27 18:57:40 · answer #11 · answered by SLEDGE 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers