Why should we tolerate the exposure by " There's a nice Kitty"..
Young children our on these sights sometimes.
2007-01-27 17:51:42 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I wasn't just thinking of children, And thanks for the Grammar lesson.
This has been reported, yet Yahoo has not done a thing about it.
It show a level of low class, and stupidity.
2007-01-27 18:03:23 · update #1
We shouldn't tolerate it at all, they should and are reported about as fast as they appear. There is something sick and twisted to want to expose children to their perversion, pedophiles.
There are plenty of porno sites for that.
2007-01-27 17:58:19 · answer #1 · answered by Angelz 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's nice to see someone with a little humor once and a while, not to mention how boring yahoo avatars are. If your kids are on the computer try keeping them off of sites where there might be questionable content. As for low class try to laugh a little, it'll loosen your sphincter up just enough so you can pull your head right out.
2007-01-28 02:32:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We shouldn't. If something offends you report them. Yahoo will take care of it. Other than that, I would say, keep your kids off. This site is not really for children.
2007-01-28 01:57:58 · answer #3 · answered by micheletmoore 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was thinking the same thing. They don't bother me too much, but people need to respect other peoples children that shouldnt have to look at that to ask a question.
2007-01-28 01:58:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes,its inappropriate for a 13year-old like me to have to look at these disgusting avatars.Plus they always ask the dimmest questions.
2007-01-28 01:57:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm glad you said somethin because I was just about to post the same exact thing. That is disgusting and degradeable. There's nothin "flippin funny" about it.
2007-01-28 01:57:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I take issue with the 'children visit this site' argument; parents are responsible for keeping control over a computer that's in their own damned house, for Pete's sake. But, it is extremely immature and unoriginal of whoever it is who keeps posting that stuff. I mean c'mon, at least post something funny....
2007-01-28 01:57:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Know that the Blue God from under the Sea is very displeased
2007-01-28 01:57:49 · answer #8 · answered by JACK 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Completely agree - it should be reported
2007-01-28 01:55:39 · answer #9 · answered by Tony S 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah! lets blame what our children wach for what they watch! it's not like a parent can curtail what their children are exposed to online right!
2007-01-28 01:58:33 · answer #10 · answered by Dashes 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋