English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-27 17:42:33 · 29 answers · asked by shajibp 1 in Society & Culture Community Service

29 answers

Hillary Clinton has more chances of winning the race.

2007-01-29 00:49:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well that is a very difficult question to answer before the Primaries, personally I perfer to wait until the Iowa Caucus, before I make an official decision. Now if youw question were to be changed slightly to who I think would make the best president out of all the choices presented to me at this time. I would say that Obama would be the best bet, he has demonstrated to me that he is a man of integrity and willing to admit when he is not informed enough to make a decision, which I believe is a problem the current administration has yet to overcome, and they have had almost eight years to do so. If his name ends up on the ballet... he has my vote.

2007-01-30 09:31:40 · answer #2 · answered by Caramon S 1 · 0 0

This is what will happen. Mitt Romney, former governor of Massachusetts, will take the white house, the man is brilliant. He ran for Senate against Ted Kennedy as an unknown in 1994 and gave him the biggest run for his money ever, Romney fell apart in the last 45 days and fell to Kennedy by 11 points. He provided seed capital Staples with a mere $400K. He turned around the Utah winter Olympics and made it a success, since it was loosing money. He wants to cut the fat out of government. He wants to get rid of departments like Commerce and Education since every state does its own thing. These groups are costing us money for paper pushers. He thinks government should run with profits and losses, so do I. If you don't make me money you are fired. The democrats now in power they will prove again they cannot handle government. They will bring back troops, we will be attacked again on US soil worse than 9/11, biological or nuclear warfare. Osama Bin Laden will be captured in late September or early October. This will put the Republicans back in power by a landslide.

2007-01-31 14:53:57 · answer #3 · answered by Mark T 6 · 0 0

There is a genius out there somewhere. He can fix everything. He would get us out of the war. He can make world peace happen, and national health-care a reality. He would lower taxes for everyone. Raise the education standards in America. He would get an effective crime bill through congress. Innocent men would be released and the guilty would serve their time. He would end the drug wars and the drug problem in America. there would never be any homelessness and he would clean up our environment and put more energy efficient cars and trucks on the road. He will never sell out or give in. He would do more for this country in four years then anyone else has in the last fifty. His name is Krom.

2007-01-29 20:02:00 · answer #4 · answered by Fat Fred Fontaine 2 · 0 0

It won't be George Bush and that's the best thing EVER! I'd like to see someone a little more diverse. I'm not so keen on Hilary Clinton, I didn't care for the way she ran things for her husband so I'll pass on her. Obama is a thought. I haven't done much research on him though. Just someone that could open America's eyes to something new, fresh and definitely someone with a little compassion.

2007-01-30 13:33:05 · answer #5 · answered by Amanda Fenn 1 · 0 0

Who can say? No one really knows at this point. But we do know it won't be George W. The only 2 so far that I would consider voting for are Hilary Clinton & Barack Obama.

2007-01-29 11:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by Sandi Beach 4 · 0 0

John McCain with Rudy as Vice

2007-01-28 06:38:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Who cares. They all are stupid and end up doing the same stupid stuff. Overspending because it's not PC to say to people they should take care of their own damn problems and getting involved in interventionist military campaigns where they refuse to use overwhelming force and let our troops take cassualties in order to spare enemy civilians. If you don't think a problem is worth killing people to solve, don't go to war, idiots. There's a reason it's called war and not Romper ROom happy play and hug hour.

If someone ran for office saying he was going to cut taxes, privitize social security, and lay several square blocks of Baghdad flat, I'd vote for him. I want to see campaign posters that say, "Take care of your own grandma, she took care of you;" and, "Enemy civilians are still enemies."

Man, if some politician said during the Presidential debate, "I don't think we should have gone to Iraq. That was a huge mistake. I apolagie to the Iraqi people for that; but now, since folks are shooting at our boys I'm bulldozing the whole motha flat and setting it on fire because all of them aren't worth one AMerican soldier and I'm setting an example." I'd vote for him, and get a couple false IDs so I could do it several times.

2007-01-28 10:11:48 · answer #8 · answered by Sammer (Jim W) 2 · 0 0

Hillary

2007-01-27 17:54:13 · answer #9 · answered by crazy 2 · 0 1

Hillary

2007-01-27 17:50:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers