That's a great leap of faith there...believing in evolution...macro-evolution. If it was valid, the apes in the zoo would bear human-like offspring. That is why those links are called missing-links...they're missing cause they don't exist. Macro-evolution is one of modern human's greatest sci-fi epics.
2007-02-04 10:53:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jalapinomex 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, two chromosomes will fuse to make one, right and so 4 chromosomes of apes fused to make two smarter one that is how apes have 48 chromosomes and Humans only have 46.....does that make sense to you.
2007-02-04 22:40:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sam- the "big boss" 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you repeat a lie long enough people start to believe it...that is what evolution is all about.
There is plenty of evidence AGAINST EVOLUTION:.
First, the 'Cambrian explosion'...... the millions of fossil types in Cambrian rock (oldest fossil bearing rocks) appear suddenly and fully formed and without any previous forms...IOW, there are no transitional forms.
Most well educated evolutionists, when forced to, will admit it, but very unwillingly, and even then they always want to seem to make new excuses for it. Usually they just don't say anything about it and hope noone finds out.
The thing to remember is that evolution is still just a theory - a hypothesis, a speculation, an unproven assumption.
2007-01-28 00:38:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
first of all down-syndrome has to do with chromosome 21 not chromosome 2, secondly, do you have a Phd in biology, molecular biology, genetics or the likes? Why reject something when yolu don't have the adequate knowledge
2007-01-28 00:42:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
48 is superior to 46. Apes don't kill apes.
2007-02-03 12:22:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by airreformer 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ape-like ancestor, not apes. So comparing humans to apes in that sense is irrelevant.
2007-01-28 00:39:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
it doesnt exists a good mutation all are negatives for humans, except in the evolution theory, wich is a theory.
2007-01-28 00:51:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do not see why all of the fuss no one that we know can tell what happen at the beginning of time
2007-02-04 23:02:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by the black hand 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You argue against it but fail to back it up with research. Your source?
2007-02-04 22:53:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by americansneedtowakeup 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
worldly people like worldly answers. swindled
2007-02-04 01:32:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by swindled 7
·
1⤊
0⤋