It's in the Bible.
Flintstones 5:22
Flintstones, meet the Flintstones,
They're the modern stone-age family.
From the town of Bedrock,
They're a page right out of history.
Let's ride with the family down the street,
Through the courtesy of Fred's two feet.
When you're with the Flintstones,
You'll have a yabba doo time,
A dabba doo time,
You'll have a gay old time.
2007-01-27 16:18:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lee Harvey Wallbanger 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Absolutely, they did. I don't believe that anything could last a million years, let alone, 65 million years. It would break down chemically, long before that.
Carbon dating is notoriously unreliable, partiularly for things older than about 2000 BC. I think the quest we should resolve is: why is carbon 14 dating the system that is used by evolutionists? There are a few dozen systems for dating. Most of them tend to give much earlier dates. I wonder if that could be the reason.
Evolutionists say that evolution is so slow that it takes millions of years, so we use a system that give (most of the time) very old ages. Is that circular reasoning? Very long periods are required, and that's why carbon 14 is used.
I have heard that there are dinosaur prints somewhere out west with human foot prints superimposed on them. That really doesn't surprise me. Another consideration is all of the various cultures that have a mythological creature that we call a dragon. Now, dinosaurs are a pretty recent discovery, but dragons go back thousands of years. In Genesis, there is reference to a creature called behemouth. The discription doesn't sound like any animal living today, but it does sound like a description of a dinosaur.
So, I believe if we look at the evidence, dinosaurs would seem to be contemporaneous with early humans. The only reason that one would think otherwise is because of carbon 14 dating, and I have already given my opinion on that.
2007-01-27 16:27:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by iraqisax 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
It's no use if you try to explain it to them.They will say that carbon dating is not accurate and they will post up some fake picture where the footprint of dinosaurs and human to prove human and dinosaurs co-existed.
Lastly they will say that Satan put the fossil to fool people.
Faking picture are easy to do now,Suspendor of believe.
2007-01-27 16:18:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Green Lantern 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Most of creationists have never actually read books that support creationism. They honestly fly by the seat of their pants when they talk about it. I was reading a creationist book a couple weeks ago, and it was honestly hilarious how they tried to explain fossils, and how they talked about evolution (they said so many innacurate things about it to make their own ideas sound better).
2016-03-29 05:52:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every living creature was brought before Adam to which God gave Adam the authority to name every living creature, which includes the dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs are ONE of the reasons why God sent the flood. The dinosaurs and the giants consumed all life and made it unbearable for man to live.
People always say, "Noah could never of taken dinosaurs on the Ark." Noah could take the small baby dinosaurs, BUT NOT THE FULL GROWN ADULTS."
NO they are not put there by Satan to fool people. GOD PUT THEM THERE TO SHOW HIM OF HIS AMAZING CREATIONS. God put the fossils there for our enjoyment and to show His imagination. to explorer what the first world was like(the world before the flood).
Ever thought that in Heaven there may be dinosaurs??? What we see and find on the earth is just an introduction as to what will is in Heaven.
The sea creatures, dinosaurs would of been the only ones to have survived the flood, thus that is why they show up in Job and even today.
2007-01-27 16:23:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by sanctusreal77 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
In peru "REAL" scientist;not backed by an organization from an evolutionist university found a illustration on a ruin showing a pleasaurus in full detail alongside normal animal figures. Carbon dating is as acurate as toilet paper from a dollar store.
2007-01-27 16:26:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Carbon dating may be inaccurate, as science has always claimed its perfection....until another method comes along. The Greeks believed the elements to be fire, water, earth, stone and wind. We have a different theory, so we stick to it. Besides, science is basically applying math to life. So if the person who came up with the technique made a miscalculation, and no one found the error, it could throw the results off by hundreds ouf millions of years. math can do that.
dinosaurs could have died out before or after Noah's flood (they were mentioned in the book of Job)
2007-01-27 16:19:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hey, Ray 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
There is a growing consensus that carbon dating is not reliable because some global catastrophe like the great flood resets the clock.
2007-01-27 16:19:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kenneth729 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
What's that river in Texas where they have dino and human prints side-by-side? Pauluxi? There's a trail they found, that leads under a hill. How did they fake THAT, when you can go there now and dig out fresh fossil tracks yourself?
2007-01-27 16:21:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Radiological dating methods that were developed for evolution thoery have been proven to be very unreliable...
Don't be deceived by the nonsense evolution theory throws at you ...it has no basis.
The thing to remember is that evolution is still just a theory - a hypothesis, a speculation, an unproven assumption.
According to Scripture NOTHING evolved but everything was created "AFTER THEIR KIND"....
"From the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female..."-- Jesus (Mk. 10:6)
Scripture says God SPOKE all things into existence with His Word:
" By the Word of the Lord were the heavens created, and all the host by the breath of His mouth. For HE SPAKE AND IT WAS DONE; HE COMMANDED AND IT STOOD FAST". (psalm 33:9)
2007-01-27 16:16:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
6⤋