is this evidence against the big bang?

Question

Law of thermodynamics? Big bang contradicts the second law also.

Scientists call it the first law of thermodynamics. Isaac Asimov says that “this law is considered the most powerful and most fundamental generalization about the universe that scientists have ever been able to make.”1 What is this law that lies at the base of all modern science? It is the fact that while you can convert matter to energy (like heat that results from a burning log), you cannot create energy or matter out of nothing. So, since we know that our universe is made up of matter and energy, we have to face the
reality that it had to come from somewhere. Despite the incredible advances of modern science, the fact remains that not one of our scientific theories can even begin to explain where the energy and matter came from in the first place. Creation is the only plausible
theory that anyone has been able to offer.

Answer 1

amen!

Answer 2

Currently, the Big Bang model of the origin of the universe is the cosmological paradigm most widely accepted by astronomers. It holds that about 15 billion years ago the universe began with the explosive expansion of a single, extremely dense matter, the primordial mass. Only after the development of radio telescopes in 1937 that, the necessary observational precision was achieved in order for astronomers to arrive at the above conclusion. What does the Quran say about our universe's origin?

"Do not the unbelievers see that the Heavens and the earth were joined together, then We split them apart." (21:30)

Answer 3

we don't know exactly where it came from, perhaps from a previous universe, or whatever there may have been before, but the theory itself does not contradict the big bang theory at all. in my opinion it supports it. science doesn't have all the answers yet, and there are so many questions that it may never have all the answers, but the fact is that the answers we do have go against creation, and science admits it does not have all the answers and tries to find them, but creation is making up answers based on nothing to appear like know-it-alls.

now explain the biggest question of all, where did god come from?? if u say he/she was always there, ur logic is flawed and probably not worth listening to.

Answer 4

You need to study the Big Bang Theory. Your knowledge of it seems limited at best. The very thing you speak of is addressed. And to call creationism a theory is a joke. It is a story, mythological at that, with no basis in fact and with absolutely no evidence to support it. And last, perhaps you should look at the definition of a theory. It is not a blind guess. In science, a theory is a proposed description, explanation, or model of the manner of interaction of a set of natural phenomena, capable of predicting future occurrences or observations of the same kind, and capable of being tested through experiment or otherwise falsified through empirical observation. It follows from this that for scientists "theory" and "fact" do not necessarily stand in opposition.

Answer 5

1) By your logic there also can not be a god because he would have had to be created out of nothing.

2) We don't know what happened before the big bang. Nobody knows. We are still working on it. We may never know. But that is no reason to through the theory out.

3) Consider Quantum Mechanics. Things do appear out of nowhere and things happen without cause.

Good question, though.

Answer 6

Actually Guth's inflation model tells us exactly how mass/energy formed and it happened after the big bang event as the direct result of inflation. Mass/Energy forms in exact measure to the negative gravitational potential energy resulting from the rapid inflation.

The fact you are clueless about it is not evidence for anything.

Although more and more mass/energy appeared as the false vacuum expanded, the total energy was conserved. The energy of a gravitational field is negative! The positive energy of the false vacuum was compensated by the negative energy of gravity. Since positive mass energy always exactly balances negative gravitational potential energy the universe's total mass/energy is always exactly zero and no conservation violation occurs.

Answer 7

I'm not going to claim the big bang theory is flawless, but to me, it has created more things (ahem technology) than the bible has. There is also more plausible evidence (red shifts) for the big bang theory than for something which was written by a bunch of men from stories that were once told by word of mouth.

Answer 8

Creation is NOT plausible, and not a theory. Theories can be tested, creationism is a GUESS that can not be tested.

And you obviously have not done much research about how matter came into existence. We DO have theories that apply to the creation of the universe. Check out "M Theory".

Answer 9

I can prove the Big Bang in three words: Cosmic Microwave Background.

Answer 10

you make a good point, although I wouldn't use a science FICTION writer as your only source. Creation is equally plausible/implausible as is "it was just always there" --keep working on that time machine so we can finally know what actually happened, okay?

Answer 11

The universe was always here in some form. Problem solved.