I know this is a good question to keep you from believing in a Creator (God) and a good one at that. But check this out: Since God made the sun, moon, and stars "to give light upon the earth" (Genesis !;14-18) those lights would be immediately visible on earth. They fulfilled their purpose on the day God spoke them into being, because He "saw that it was good." No doubt God also made Adam as a fully grown man perhaps with the appearance of being 30yrs old, even though he was only minutes old. Likewise, herbs and trees were aleady mature and fruit-bearing, to provide a ready supply of food. That would be the case with all of His creation. Now won't you please believe in God?
2007-01-27 14:26:22 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Congrats.
That has to be, without a doubt, the single stupidest question I've read on Y answers.
You've lowered the collective IQ of everyone here.
On the other hand, I now have something to post on FSTDT.com (fundies say the darndest things. com)
So, thanks!
2007-01-27 14:31:37 · answer #1 · answered by Yoda Greene 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Light is not immediately visible, and your opinions are not true. Light takes millions of years to reach the Earth from distant stars, and we can even see light from stars billions of light years away. This means WITH A DOUBT that the universe is Billions of years old....I suggest you deal with reality
2007-01-27 14:31:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
To answer you title question: Just about anyone who understands that this is logical disproof of the Genesis creation.
To answer your last question: No. And why are there stars that cannot be seen with naked eye. How much light do they give "upon the earth?"
2007-01-27 14:37:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well how do you explain that the Earth shows its age as 4 or more billion years old, do you think science is just a tool of satan?
2007-01-27 14:32:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the light from the stars is just a small aspect of an old world
if it were that alone then yes it may be a plausible suggestion
but it isn't
2007-01-27 14:32:06 · answer #5 · answered by Peace 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like a load of dingo's kidneys.
2007-01-27 14:31:22 · answer #6 · answered by kordan_barterson 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe in an imaginary God, does that count?
2007-01-27 14:30:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Let me ponder this for a brief moment...
No.
2007-01-27 14:30:50 · answer #8 · answered by Vader 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋