2007-01-27 13:19:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Considering that the only way to do this would be with an iron-fisted dictatorship - no freedoms, dissidents 'disappearing', state controlled media, censorship etc.
The moment you allow different opinions you create the possibility for conflict. The only way to prevent this is to enforce a ban on all dissent.
2007-01-27 13:53:38 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, it would be easy for me to become the surpreme ruler of the world. A world full of passivist would just roll over and name me their ruler rather than stand up against me and face the possibility that I would, OMG, make war on them.
I think I would call myself Evil King Evergreen, surpreme ruler of the world. I'd be making all the decisions for the passivist. Because I may not know whats best for them, but I certainly know whats best for me.
Probably somebody worse than me would come along and knock me off my lofty perch. So I'd say it would be a world ruled by progressively worse and more ruthless dictators until people grew a pair and decided maybe war wasn't the worst thing that could happen.
2007-01-27 13:30:18 · answer #2 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Almost all modern technology was designed for or from warfare.
Portable Wireless communications
Digital computers
Jet aircraft
Anti-biotics
Better food preservation, like cereal bars and granola bars
Space travel
I'm not saying these things would have never been invented but with out the billions of dollars that governments invested in these technologies their upcoming would have been much delayed. It might be like living in the 1930's
2007-01-27 14:24:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The world would be without the human population
2007-01-27 13:51:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jd 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
More over populated than it is now.
2007-01-27 13:25:29 · answer #5 · answered by HITLERY 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
?? super... and just exactly how is this to be accomplished?... oh, wait a minute... I know... "VISUALIZE PEACE" That will do it!
2007-01-27 13:54:00 · answer #6 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
there would be less poor people, because their would be more money to help them
2007-01-27 13:24:54 · answer #7 · answered by crossndunk 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
very, very crowded.
it'll never happen.
2007-01-27 13:23:43 · answer #8 · answered by political junkie 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋