English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Because those animals aren't found anywhere else. Oh, yeah, and a side trip to Madagascar. I assume he went to the artic for polar bears and the antartic for penguins somewhere in that 40 days as well? Or are those animals part of another creation that wasn't written anywhere?

2007-01-27 13:15:19 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I'm finding it fascinating how many creationists are using science to support their fable....Pangea, continental drift....very impressive. Those ideas are integral to evolutionary theory. Why do you select some science to believe and not to? How do you decide which science to believe? Is it random cherry picking to support your preconceived delusion like you do with the bible? Cause that's not how science works.

2007-01-27 13:27:21 · update #1

23 answers

That is very easy If compared it with the work of Santa in the 24-25 of December.

2007-01-27 13:21:33 · answer #1 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 3 0

Any geologist could tell the Creationists (not that they'd listen) that Pangea did not split apart in only a couple of thousand years. The process was already well done by the time modern humanity showed up.

Don't listen to me: Go ask a geologist...a real one, not some pseudoscientists who got paid off by the Discovery Insititute!

2007-01-27 13:55:15 · answer #2 · answered by Scott M 7 · 0 0

Good Question.

And if Noah's Ark landed in Turkey (or where ever), how did Kangaroos get back to Australia from Turkey?

Or perhpas Noah's Arc is simply a parable [read: fantasy] and not to be taken litterally, like the rest of the bible.

2007-01-27 13:26:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Well, the world was all one for starters. I believe the Science people call it Pangaea. In the Bible the world starts shifting, plate tectonics, in the year Peleg is born.

So, if the world was one it would be plausible to gather the animals, but still no small feat.

I would quote the scriptures, but I do not think you believe it so...< Notice I said in scriptures so you see the Bible contained these truths long before a scientist figured it out and gave it a fancy name.

2007-01-27 13:30:03 · answer #4 · answered by crimthann69 6 · 1 3

Gen 7:6 And Noah [was] six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.
I'd say he had some time to build the Ark and collect the animals..
By the way, it wasn't just 2 of each..
Gen 7:2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that [are] not clean by two, the male and his female.
Gen 7:3 Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.

2007-01-27 13:29:41 · answer #5 · answered by watcherd 4 · 0 2

After the flood, Noah's genealogy is given in Genesis 10. There in verse 25 it is mentioned, as scientists say, that the earth was one large land mass as one time. And in that verse it says the earth was divided.

So we can correctly say that the earth was one land mass during the flood, so all the animals from all over the world would have shared the land.

Noah>Shem>Arphaxad>Eber>Peleg&Joktan when the earth divided. (Genesis 10:21-25)

2007-01-27 13:37:09 · answer #6 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 0 2

To sum an answer up that has been asked many times, the earth probably was in Pangea form at that time, and the flood was the catalyst that started the tectonic plates moving. The animals happened to be in a certain location in herd format, as many animals like to be, and as the plates slowly drifted apart, the animals became separated from one another.

2007-01-27 13:21:41 · answer #7 · answered by Iamnotarobot (former believer) 6 · 0 4

Creationists believe the world was one solid land mass before the flood - just like evolutionists - except they believe it divided into continents only recently, after the flood.

2007-01-27 13:23:21 · answer #8 · answered by wefmeister 7 · 2 0

The arc became no longer interior the sea the position there have been ice bergs. Did you observe the action picture tremendous? the tremendous water-resistant doors had an beginning on the right! no one concept water ought to fill the entire room, and then pour intense?

2016-10-16 04:58:00 · answer #9 · answered by curella 4 · 0 0

Noah got all the animals BEFORE he got on the arc, not after, so the forty days is gone. And second, those animals could have migrated to Australia after the flood. And maybe he could have lived on Pangaea. And who said he lived in Turkey, he LANDED in Turkey, well actually it shoud be armenia, but anyways read the bible before asking a question like that.

2007-01-27 13:18:40 · answer #10 · answered by YouCannotKnowUnlessUAsk 6 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers