How about this? We accept that all of the people who believe in science have evolved, and all of those who don't have not.
2007-01-27 12:33:18 · 19 answers · asked by neil s 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
yes, Derbonic, and someone either believes the method works or they don't
2007-01-27 12:57:39 · update #1
That seems accurate.
People who don't accept evolution resemble their simian ancestors in thought pattern, thats for sure.
2007-01-27 12:37:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Well yes that seems fair. Those of us who believe in evolution have evolved to smarter beings who have decerning thought and the creationist are still living somewhere around 1200-1500 A.D. Sounds about right.
2007-01-27 12:41:31 · answer #2 · answered by fifimsp1 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes that seems reasonable. People who accept evolution have more evolved minds than those who reject it and believe that ancient fiction is the truth.
2007-01-27 12:41:05 · answer #3 · answered by acgsk 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
including sensible layout to technological know-how texbooks isn't a compromise because it is authentic technological know-how. I doubt maximum individuals recognize the helping data used for identity. The Bible is of direction no longer a technological know-how texbook even though it only is wise that because it is view on origens is the most universally popular one and for that reason ought to a minimum of be stated in technological know-how because of its significantly popular cosmology which could't be omitted interior the authentic international. To be straightforward, "macroevolution" belongs interior the comparative faith instructions.
2016-10-16 04:55:22 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not agree with this theory. Evolution of the mind is only a part of the evolution of the human being.
2007-01-27 12:46:42 · answer #5 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
science does not require belief. Science is a Method.
2007-01-27 12:53:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science is still confused and at a loss explain many things.
Name one scientist or theory that can define the source of all motion.
I hardly call that "evolving".
2007-01-27 13:01:05 · answer #7 · answered by watcherd 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Or, we accept that evolution is a fact, and those who don't "believe in it" are hopelessly ignorant and backward.
2007-01-27 12:42:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Makes perfect sense in all aspects. However, believers will probably be mad because we call them "unevolved." Wait, isn't that defeating their whole purpose? :)
2007-01-27 12:47:58 · answer #9 · answered by The FudgeMaster 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
he he he... sounds like a plan! Next time someone tells me I am going to hell, I can tell them they are de-evolving... LMAO.
2007-01-27 13:01:37 · answer #10 · answered by Kelly + Eternal Universal Energy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋