All the 289 2Bbls had "200" Hp in that era
'64 4V had 210hp
'65~'67 4V had 225 with higher compression & a bigger carb
The '67 Hi-Po had 271
In '68 289's dropped back to 195hp rating
And '68 302's had 210 hp 2v and 230 hp 4v
hope that helps
2007-01-27 10:03:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe in 1967 there were 2 types of 289 V8s by Ford, 1 was for the Mustang and the other was for the Fairlane (?).
V8 289 195 bhp - Fairlane
V8 289 271 bhp - Mustang
Remember that in 1967 bhp and hp ratings are deceptive as starting in 1971 and 72 they moved the ratings from the engine to the axle (this generally lowered the hp ratings)
Starting in 1971 automakers began to quote power in terms of SAE net horsepower (as defined by standard J1349). This reflected the rated power of the engine in as-installed trim, with all accessories and standard intake and exhaust systems. By 1972 U.S. carmakers quoted power exclusively in SAE net hp. The change was meant to 'deflate' power ratings to assuage the auto insurance industry and environmental and safety lobbies, as well as to obfuscate the power losses caused by emissions-control equipment.
2007-01-27 09:57:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Blitzhund 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
the hi-po 289 which was the biggest and baddest had 271 hp. and the regular 289 was around 225.
2007-01-27 13:39:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by mister ss 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
which engine? 200 hp, 225 hp, 271 hp,
woops I got carried away reading about all that HP,
390 ci, 265 hp, 275 hp, 315 hp, 335 hp. I wont list the 427 or 428, but they were available :)
A very good year!
2007-01-27 15:07:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It should be 300 horses but it was a puny engine...the 428 was the beast
2007-01-31 06:13:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by D.E.O.N. Sphinxxx 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was the first 1 hp per c.i.d. (289hp)!!!
2007-01-27 09:48:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
0 coz fordz are american garbage
2007-01-27 09:53:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Not enough.
2007-01-27 09:50:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by kekeke 5
·
1⤊
2⤋