Well evolution doesnt postulate social darwinism so I fail to see the relevance of the question. At the very least its in the wrong section.
2007-01-27 09:47:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Goodly Devil 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know about Marx triggering the women's movement. I guess if everybody in society was equal, then women would be too. But I've never heard that theory.
If you believe social Darwinism, you don't bother helping poor, sick, mentally ill, mentally challenged, brain damaged, or young/old people. They're not the strongest, so they'll just have to falter on their own. It's a little unfair. No social programs to help out those who need help.
2007-01-27 17:46:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by SlowClap 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Marx triggered the womens movement it was to further his evil ideas of atheistic communism,Darwin was innocent by the fact that he was a stuttering old fool with advanced senility.
2007-01-27 17:49:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sentinel 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The consequences of "social darwinism" (not an idea Darwin ever had) have so far been: Communism, Capitalism, Fascism, Philanthropy and Greed. Truly all things to all men.
2007-01-27 17:46:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Marx, ah you mean Groucho ! Groucho said , " Any man that can see through a woman is missing a lot. "
2007-01-27 17:49:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Imagine the nerve of women, thinking they're equal to men.
2007-01-27 17:48:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by tychobrahe 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Trying to get other people to do your homework?
2007-01-27 17:45:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Uncle Thesis 7
·
2⤊
0⤋