The Gospels do not identify it writers, but have been attributed to those who's names appear on them: Matthew/Mark/Luke/John.
One thing I can assure you is that the writers were inspired by God!!
steadfast1
2007-01-27 07:40:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Steadfast † One 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can find the "symbols" below I believe.
None of the authors are known.
It is commonly assumed that the young man who ran away naked at Gethsemane was Mark. It has been suggested he was a close follower of Peter and it thus represents a "Petrine" theology.
Mattthew was written w/ a slant toward the Jews. He used parts of Mark and of a no longer extant pre-text called Q.
Luke is also believed to have Q as he shaped his material toward the Gentiles.
John remains a mystery. Is he the disciple Jesus appeared to offered a cup of sufferinng to like his brother James. James died early in Acts. Tradition states John on the other hand lived long and could have written the Gospel and possibly Revelation.
2007-01-27 07:29:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
each and every of the gospels were written by technique of the human beings named (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). Matthew and John were disciples of Jesus and Mark and Luke were students of the Apostle Peter and the Apostle Paul. the criteria to make it into the "The Bible" we see in the present day might want to be to be written by technique of a correct away apostle to Jesus or an apostle of an apostle. This turned right into a call made as human beings were attempting to operate to the teachings in Christianity over the years and the outcome become known pretend teachings. that's why that Bible become cannonized and the leaders set particular criteria as to what become allowed in and what wasn't. This ensured that we would carry ourselves to the unique teachings of Christ as given to his disciples. there are various books accessible that run in protecting with the teachings of Christianity, yet did not meet the criteria. Are they alright to verify or take in? effective. yet that is the component. they actually do not say some thing diverse than what's already contained in the Bible. for this reason, the Bible is sufficient. various the different Gospels that were written properly after the data and given names of human beings that were widely used to be round Jesus at the same time as He become strolling this earth. those books (The Gnostic Gospels operating example) are loaded with intricate teachings no longer chanced on contained in the recent testomony and are not widely used by technique of the Christian churches.
2016-12-03 03:02:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gospel of Matthew was written by Matthew.
Gospel of Mark does not name its author, but it is commonly accepted that it was written by John Mark, cousin of Barnabas. Mark was not one of the original 12 disciples.
Luke was written by Luke as the first of 2-volume series with Acts.
John is assumed to have been written by John the younger brother of James.
Matthew was written to the Jews, which is why you have the genelogy at the beginning. Without this, there would be credibility, especially if claiming Jesus as the promised Messiah.
Mark's gospel was written at a time when early Christians were under severe persecution from Nero, who blamed them for burning Rome. This book was written to bring hope, encouragement and meaning to the suffering they were experiencing.
Luke was a Gentile and was writing for that audience.
Like Luke, John too was writing to show with physical evidence that Jesus is the Son of God as he states in 20:30-31, "And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name."
2007-01-27 06:58:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by oh nedla 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Read about the writer in the beginning of each Gospel book.
2007-01-27 07:17:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by t_a_m_i_l 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
All 4 gospels were written well after the fact and none can claim any direct contact with jesus at all.
Mark - written around 70 AD - unknown exact identity - relied completely on heresay - not an eye witness account
Matthew - written around 80 AD - not an eye witness - Jewish writer - copied parts of Mark and added his own parts - was the first to add the Lord's Prayer, Sermon on the Mount, and the Christmas Story
Luke - written around 90 AD - again not an eye witness to anything - unknown exact identity - added ACTS
John - written around 100 AD - Jewish writer - new angle, new version of Jesus, more divine
2007-01-27 07:00:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Wow, just look at all the wrong answers. People are so ignorant of their own religion!
There is a LOT of debate on when they were written, and who wrote them. Here is a link to a good discussion about this:
http://www.geocities.com/questioningpage/When.html
2007-01-27 07:01:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by atheist jesus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The writer of the gospel of John wasn't even a contemporary of Christ-they never met. If someone has valid evidence proving otherwise I'd like to see it.
2007-01-27 06:53:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Matthew wrote Matthew, Mark wrote Mark, Luke wrote Luke, and John wrote John
2007-01-27 06:39:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Friend 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
We have Matthew (one of the twelve disciples of Jesus; also called Levi)
We have Mark (close associate of Peter; also called John Mark)
We have Luke (doctor/friend of the Apostle Paul)
We have John (one of the twelve disciples of Jesus; the one whom Jesus loved)
2007-01-27 06:45:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by visitorparkingonly 2
·
1⤊
0⤋