http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html
Have a nice day!
2007-01-27 05:15:14 · 5 answers · asked by a sock 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They are not 'transitional'.
Have not people ever noticed that all the fossils of life forms came about in the same levels of sediment?
It is as if all these different lifeforms, sprang up simultaneously.
This type of commentary is best defined as 'rhetoric'.
2007-01-27 05:18:56 · answer #1 · answered by Tim 47 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Can you connect them, pal? Of course not-you are an idiot looking for an argument. Every "missing link" so far has exposed as what it really was -fraud. If you have to repeat lies to cover for your belief-then its pretty weak-don't ya think?
Evolution has changed so many times it is laughable. The creation story is the same as it was when first recorded about 3500 years ago.
Evolutionist can not verify a date beyond 5,500 years. Are you aware of that? Everything older than that is speculation. And it is based on the assumed ages of the geologic strata. Its just a guess, you idiot. Check it out, prove me wrong if you can-you can not. There is no test that can verify a date taken from the "index fossil" and the geologic column. Some idiot will say "radio-metric" dating can verify. No radio-metric data is acceptable if it does not agree with the index fossil. The index fossil is based on an assumption. It is a guess-at best. Just how old are those dinosaur bones????? Are you positive?? "Only fools are positive"?
You have a nice day!
2007-01-27 13:29:54 · answer #2 · answered by Desperado 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Every fossil species and every living species falls into one of two categories - virtually extinct, or transitional. Nothing remains the same. They either disappear or they change, and with sufficient change, become something else. That's biology as God designed it.
.
2007-01-27 13:27:53 · answer #3 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first thing I noticed was to find a transitional fossil you had to change the definition of transitional fossils. Sounds like Bill Clinton trying to redefine sex. It didn't work for him and it doesn't work now.
2007-01-27 13:19:43 · answer #4 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Chickens have feathers but do not fly. How would one prove God did not create them.
2007-01-27 13:26:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋