I don't buy into the more loaded comparisons that Bush is a genocidal fascist like der Fuhrer, that some folks more left of left have made. BUT in seeing how Bush's plans for Iraq mirror Hitler's Russian campaign, I'm beginning to think he needs to let more experienced field commanders decide how best to handle the campaign (perhaps not even invading Iraq in the first place, but that's all said and done...unfortunately). His latest plan just seems too little, too late..
2007-01-27 02:39:01 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Old Rummy Rumsfield ran away and now Bush and America is stuck with his alcoholic mishaps. Unlike Hitler whos generals stuck with him to the bitter end. But no, Busch is not like Hitler, Hitler was a bit smarter, but not much.
2007-01-27 02:45:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Hitler had absolute control over his army even to the point he made tactical and strategic choices. Bush allows his generals to control and act.
it was his generals who requested more troops, despite what the media says.
Who even started this asinine rumor that some how Bush sits in this war room and pushes markers around a table making military decisions?
the Russian campaign is not even closely similar to Iraq! I mean seriously show even one comparison! And i mean a legitimate comparison, not just, it was an invasion.
I bet any comparison you can think up I can disprove.
Hitler and Bush, two separate men, two separate ideas and two separate ways to run a war.
that's a fact.
The only person like Hitler was Hitler.
2007-01-27 03:38:42 · answer #2 · answered by Stone K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the full thought of evaluating Bush with Hitler got here approximately while a German government minister extra that up; a German must comprehend Hitler's features greater desirable than maximum. possibly people who're calling George Bush a Hitler are attempting to deliver to interest to the atrocities dedicated by skill of the two from the victims' attitude. If considered via the attitude of an Iraqi, George can come out worse than Hitler. the vast majority of the international looks to experience a similar way approximately Bush and Hitler; possibly because of the fact they see greater, pay attention greater from their newsmen. it is unlucky that the U. S. media has been taken over by skill of the Israelis - examine "the suitable tale Ever offered". Come to think of of it - Saddam became called many stuff yet under no circumstances a Hitler, yet Bush became!
2016-11-27 22:02:36 · answer #3 · answered by lorrie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What I think is that congress needs to quit trying to run the war and let the generals on the ground do their job. If the congress had stayed out of the way this war would already be over and we would have won. You cannot win a war and be politically correct at the same time. Terrorists only understand one thing and it comes out of the business end of a gun. President Bush tried to let the generals do it and appease congress that is where he made a mistake. He should have just listened to the generals.
2007-01-27 02:49:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hitler did considerably well against a country that was so much larger than his own. His army was larger than the Russian army and very successful in the beginning. So maybe the leader of the the terrorist regime that the US fights against is more similar to Hitler's management - and holding their own against such a huge nation....
2007-01-27 02:48:27 · answer #5 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First off, genius, Hitler and President Bush werent/arent Generals, they are Presidents . . . civilian representations of their countries.
Bush PROPOSED the war and gave his recomendations as to why, but CONGRESS approved the war and its funding, sure, blame Bush for proposing it. You should also be blaming those who represent you all in the "house" for the war if you want to blame someone.
Personally I am a fan of the "War on Terror" and I am a proud soldier who volunteered to: join the military, and to go to Iraq. I just dont agree with how the operations are going right now, I think they could be better, but I think we are in the "right" and that we are ultimately winning.
Thank you
2007-01-28 02:55:59 · answer #6 · answered by merry_rdr_of_rohan 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
President Bush isn't a general. He wasn't even in the military (it doesn't count when your daddy gets you into the National Guard and everyone else gets drafted to 'Nam, and then you never show up to weekend duty anyway)
2007-01-27 03:32:57 · answer #7 · answered by The Maestro 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler had charisma. Hitler was a good politican. Hitler at least did some good for Germany in the beginning.
W is a complete disaster, and the only reason he wasn't assassinated is because the only one worse for the job is Chaney.
2007-01-27 02:49:05 · answer #8 · answered by John K 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Thank God we have Bush as our President. It is unfortunate that ignorant people only hear what they want to hear or listen to others that have no clue.
2007-01-27 06:45:30 · answer #9 · answered by blue2blnde 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well he sure thinks he is the decider.. is that not what Hitler thought? No one else knew better than he did.. but Hitler did it for different reasons than Bush..
2007-01-27 02:46:58 · answer #10 · answered by claire_nite 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋