Question about people who believe in Theistic Evolution?

Question

Theistic Evolution is the believe that God made life, but that God used the process of Evolution to bring about the human being.

That is, a person who believes in Theistic Evolution believes the human race has a common ancestor with a chimpanzee, that this common ancestor to the naked eye would like like a monkey.

My question to people who believe in Theistic Evolution is, is who do you feel you relate with better,

Do you relate with the Creationists, who believe God made the human out of dust and clay because it says so in Genesis 1 and 2 and there was no Evolution,

or,

with people who might not necessarily believe in God (most of us recognize that there is a possibility of a God) and who believe in Evolution of man from the common ancestors.

Essentially, if you believe in Theistic Evolution, who do you get along with better - Creationists or Atheistic Evolutionists?

Answer 1

God formed the man from the dust of the earth. Just because this is said in one sentence, doesn't mean that it happened in one hour. Any amount of time could be involved in that one sentence.

Answer 2

First, great question.

Second: "Evolutionist" is not a word in the sense you're talking about. The "-ist" implies that the person "believes" in evolution. One does not "believe" or "disbelieve" in evolution; one either accepts or ignores its reality.

Third: I get along better with people who accept evolution than those who do not. Remember all the people who kept saying global warming was a scam? Well, that's how I feel about hard creationists.

There has been more new evidence for evolution in the last twelve months than there has been for creationism in the past two thousand years. People can believe as they please, but it doesn't make sense to believe something that directly contradicts sound scientific theory.

Answer 3

I'm a Christian and also a biologist. Scientifically I get along better with atheistic biologists. Spiritually I get along better with creationists. On the one hand I have much in common with both, since I do absolutely acknowledge the fact that God is the Creator and source of all that exists, and also recognize the fact of biological evolution.

On the other hand, I deplore ignorance, especially voluntarily chosen ignorance, and both of the groups you mention are steeped in ignorance, and out of touch with much of reality, simply because they stubbornly refuse to honestly look at the evidence, for fear that their unfounded notions may be proven wrong. Their ideology is their God, and truth is the victim of their chosen position.
.

Answer 4

I am now an agnostic -- but was raised Catholic. I was taught about evolution in both Catholic High School and in a Catholic University.

I try to get along with everyone -- atheists, agnostics, Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, . . . . The fact that we don't agree on many things doesn't keep me from getting along with them. However, I don't get along well with those who try to foist their religion on me -- especially when they try to legislate it. I have no problem with someone being a Creationist -- but have a problem when he tries to get it taught in the classroom.

Most Christians have no problem with evolution. It is really just a fringe group of Christian Extremists who take Genesis literally. I found (and find) it hard to identify with them for several reasons -- but the main one is that they lack any kind of logical consistency in their religion. Say what you will about Catholics -- there is a consistency in their religion that most Protestant religions lack.

As an example of their logical inconsistency -- they say that they believe Genesis because it is the Bible and it should be taken literally. However, they do not believe in transubstantiation -- indicating that they do not take Jesus literally when he says "This is my body" and "this is my blood." I don't see how they can insist that part of the Bible should be taken literally yet another part should not.

Answer 5

the challenge is easily solved at the same time as one realizes the theology of the cases which adult males wrote the bible. The author with huge extra journey than ourselves might want to in user-friendly words tell the writers what they could understand. If one reads the former testomony in a by technique of date trend you'll easily see the evolution of theology. comprehend what guy now is conscious compared to what the amoeba comprehended and comprehend that humanity can certainly probable be an eternal temporal type if humanity can bypass previous this planet and if the universe is eternal. those are issues the writers of the bible had no theory of by any ability. They did the most acceptable they could notwithstanding. As Einstein properly stated humanity does no longer even understand a million/a centesimal of one million% of what nature is attempting to inform us. merely because i will not understand the technology of resurrection or the soul does no longer ward off me from having wish in both. Who might want to have imagined cloning or area go back and forth or most of the failings we take with none interest in the present day. The bible is what that is. you'll learn many truths from interpreting books. yet all theories should be examined or experienced for someone to say to himself or herself wow that's the reality. i trust the writers of the books contained in the bible did a unprecedented pastime of passing down as a lot as they could to the destiny. i trust given 1000000000 years and an immortal innovations, all will understand extra. I actually have questions also? Questions which will be responded yet that i will not understand the answer. i'm a shown Catholic and a reformist at the same time as allowed. I have a good time with all help. i'm no longer the most proficient of intellects yet i'm obdurate. i want to understand the reality. thanks on your questions that in user-friendly words God can answer, they pastime my memory i'm no longer God.

Answer 6

Speaking as someone who understands evolution I certainly wouldnt consider someone who believes in 'theistic evolution' as any less ignorant than your average creationist.

So there's a common ancestor, what did they evolve from? Its even dumber than creationism. If you're going to accept the facts of evolution you might as well try and understand it and realise that all cellular life is related.

Answer 7

i do find myself arguing the point of evolution more than creation to be honest
i find that i have much in common with the atheist than the religious
which is strange for me considering my belief in God

but i love science though ... although i wouldnt say i am intelligent and understand it all , but it fascinates me

Answer 8

I do not believe inTheistic evolution. I believe in creationism just as God said it happened. So I would be getting along alot better with creationists.

Answer 9

Atheistic Evolutionists because they are critical thinkers and always questioning about life and our existence rather than living blindly to science.

Answer 10

Creationists