My theory for a long time has been that Iran wants Iraq for its oil. When we leave Iraq, as Nancy Palosi, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid and other Democratic liberals will have us do, how long will it be before Iran takes over?
2007-01-27 01:29:53 · 11 answers · asked by Norman G 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Iran is a longtime enemy of Iraq. Thus, when US leaves Iraq, it is an easy prey for Iran to pick.
2007-01-27 01:43:54 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Not long at all. A better question would be, If Iran does take over Iraq when the US leaves the country, how many men and women will we lose when we have to go back, under much more dire circumstances, to defeat Iran?
2007-01-27 01:49:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Your theory needs some serious revision based on an intimate knowledge of the political, social, religious and military history of the region. Iran and Iraq have a long history of fighting. Iraq is an Arab state, while Iran is a Persian state, and while that may mean little to you, its a wide chasm for Iraq and Iran.
Iran or for that matter any of the nations surrounding Iraq will stay out of the mire inside Iraq, because to get involved would mean picking sides in a raging sectarian war inside Islam. To get involved means bringing down more violence on your own people.
The fear that Iran will grow into a super power of its own is just as unfounded as the same arguments made by puppet master Cheney and puppet Bush prior to invading Iraq. We were all witness to the pathetic defense put up by what was billed as the largest and best trained Army in the world.
The propoganda being spewed out by the puppet masters army of puppets is just that propoganda. Iran is not in a position to invade anybody.
2007-01-27 01:48:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
This two countries had already war together. Iran has so much oil too, so I don't think so this is the problem. It can be happen when we get out Iraq and this two can start another war against the rest world. I hope not.
2007-01-27 02:05:55 · answer #4 · answered by cat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iraq become extra of a difficulty in 2003 and Ahmedinejad become no longer in ability till 2005. North Korea is being dealt with. they are wanting multilateral talks because with the help of the Patriot Act, Bush's administration has frozen maximum of North Korea's foreign places sources which includes $25 million in a own chinese economic corporation account used for black marketplace revenues. Bush has placed a stranglehold on this variety of tremendous number of foreign places banks of countries that help terrorism by technique of outlawing U.S. Banks from lending income one day to foreign places lenders. the lack of money is forcing North Korea decrease back to the table the position that is making key concessions in tearing down its nuclear guns classes in change for money and food. It has taken various years to attempt this, yet North Korea is bending and some major and quiet victories were received. examine the Wall street mag's coverage of this. that is fantastic what has been executed right here with the help of legislations that Bush and Congress exceeded and what's being executed, yet no longer stated. Bush and Congress attempt to do an same component with Iran. it is going to take longer is all. Bush is likewise sneaking extra provider communities into the Gulf and the Pentagon has drawn plans for the invasion in which they estimate they could wipe out Iran's air stress and army in twenty minutes and ruin their nuclear reactor on the first day. The very information that Bush become bringing a 0.33 provider crew into the Persian Gulf and also the commercial stress of the Patriot Act were major factors in Iran freeing the British sailors without an apology. Iran's hardline leaders caved in and overruled Ahmedinejad because they knew they were on the verge of a conflict they could't win with nuclear ability 2 years away.
2016-12-03 02:50:30 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES, if these democrat liberals have their way and N O, if President Bush tells them to wake
up and increase the funding for the military mission and keep the troops there until that
mission is COMPLETE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If the dimmys have their way, the Iranian government
would invade Iraq the same way as Vietnam
did in 1975 and then there can be expected
to be terrorist attacks in the USA and that is NO BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-01-27 01:44:34 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
iran doesn't have the capabilities to take over a country. plus, the U.S. will provide long lasting assistance to iraq, unless the become our enemies.
2007-01-27 02:42:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
NO! Iraq has its own government. They are trying to establish their own country's take over from our forces once we are ready to handover. Iraq want to keep their oil and money they make over it to rebuild the country.
2007-01-27 02:07:18 · answer #8 · answered by David H 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush's new song is
bomb,bomb,bomb,- bomb,bomb IRAN
He has started a major conflict for no reason in these countries.
he has no diplomatic abilities , everyone has abandoned him. He needs to be removed before its too late.
The US has been in bed with both of these counties for a long time, we made it what it is, read history, then check back with us
2007-01-27 01:40:11 · answer #9 · answered by Eric the Great *USA* 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not while they have Mr. Magoo as president. Have you seen their president? He couldn't take over Disneyland!
2007-01-27 01:34:57 · answer #10 · answered by Kate373 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋