(Note: I know it's metaphorical. But hey, both Jesus and the vampire are about eternal life through 'the blood', right?)
2007-01-27 01:22:10 · 5 answers · asked by Yahoo user 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
To the dude who says I'm blaspheming...go look elsewhere to find your blasphemy and I’m sure you’ll find it easily! I came here to learn about other people's thoughts and to learn interesting things. I don't see anything offensive in what I said. There are other religions that also mention bloodletting.
2007-01-27 02:03:08 · update #1
I think it's the neck biting thing. Plus the fact that most of the vampire's "followers" don't do it by choice. He decides it for them.
2007-01-27 01:27:19 · answer #1 · answered by Purdey EP 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Jesus's blood was shed for our salvation.
HE allowed that to save us.
The analogy is not even close.
The vampire "thing" takes blood from people and historically is done violently.
If you know it is metaphorical, then you would know the difference.
2007-01-27 09:31:27 · answer #2 · answered by dyke_in_heat 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Your avatar looks an awful lot like my sister! Except for the blue of course... I hate vampires BTW...
edit: xrami whatever... guy above me... he did have the apostles drink a symbol for his blood...
2007-01-27 09:28:42 · answer #3 · answered by Invisible_Flags 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you answerd your own question already it was metaphorical
he didnt actully get the apostles to drink blood
2007-01-27 09:28:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He said his blood and not some poor unsuspecting victim. There are similarities though.
2007-01-27 09:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by Billy Dee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋