English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You have many on the left who say that if we stop funding the troops then the war will end... But will it? Where will the next war begin? On our own soil maybe on another democratic society not unlike our own... What then? Do we continue to battle them here, there and yonder instead of keeping the fight right where it is. We haven't had an attack on our country since 9/11. Is it your view that if funding stops that war will just go away?... Or are you like me and know that if we stop funding, the war will come to us.

2007-01-27 01:14:55 · 10 answers · asked by ZpprHead 2 in Politics & Government Military

10 answers

They are dangerous to the security of the United States of America and should be watched very closely. I agree with your last
sentence. These brain dead lemmings had
better wake up and smell the coffee!!!Even if the funding is stopped, the war on terror IS NOT going away!!!

2007-01-27 01:31:39 · answer #1 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 2 0

I say to all those in favor of cutting the funding to our troops, want us to be attacked again. Thats when ww3 would probably start. They want to do this because they have their haeds so far up their butts they can't see the bigger picture. War needs to be fought to protect and preserve freedom. How do you think we got our Freedoms?If funding stops we will just find another way to create or fight in a war. the fighting will never stop. As being an enlisted member of the military i really can't say much that would endanger our progress, but i believe the war should have been fought on our own soil, where we are most familiar with the surroundings. But, in the military you don't really have an opinion. One of the restricted freedoms we have to live with.

2007-01-27 02:37:36 · answer #2 · answered by matt f 2 · 2 0

John McCain had extraordinarily sturdy credentials some years lower back. He became reliably professional-protection, professional-immigration, professional-VA/Medicare/Social protection, and many times center of the line on maximum subject concerns. yet Arizona took a turn to the unconventional top and to maintain his senate seat, so did McCain. So do no longer say that McCain is purely too pricipled to desert his backers. he's previous and he lost his one danger to grow to be President by utilising working a lackluster marketing campaign and selecting a bad working mate, on an identical time as up against a savvy political newbe. immediately, a McCain marketing campaign might fare little extra appropriate than Gingritch's.

2016-11-01 10:05:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Politicians are interested in 4 things
1-Themselves
2-Money
3-Power
4-More of all of the above
As Patton said "There is no lower form of life than a politician, and no lower form of politician than a liberal democrat!" It still holds true today.

Right now the Dem's believe they regained control because of their opposition to the war. The truth of the matter is they regained control because the Republicans squandered their opportunity to reverse liberal policies that are driving this country towards socialism and the conservatives sent them a reminder that they were very unhappy about this by not voting in the last election.

2007-01-27 01:25:57 · answer #4 · answered by pretender59321 6 · 3 0

America must be prepared to fight the war anywhere. Funding must not be decreased because the terrorists are always on the prowl.

2007-01-27 01:19:19 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 3 0

If we don't win the war on terrorism overseas, we will fight it on our doorsteps. The liberals don't have a clue what to do except bash what the Republicans have done. Remember jon cary? the one who voted for it before he voted against it? Perfect example of stupidity at work in D.C.

2007-01-27 01:22:48 · answer #6 · answered by missingora 7 · 3 0

the politicians that are going to cut the funding is only going to hurt those that they say they support, when are these people going to learn, the military is getting tired of being told that the politicians are supporting them but then behind their backs they cut the funding that they need the most,

2007-01-27 01:34:04 · answer #7 · answered by paki 5 · 2 0

I support our troops in what they are doing. But I do not support the war that Bush has ingaged in. His private little war is based on his lies. Those people have been fighting for two thousand years.Why would Bush think that He could ever stop it? If he would get his nose out of their ***,maybe they would keep theirs out of ours.We don't want them telling us what to do,just as they don't want telling them what to do ,or how to live.

2007-01-27 01:26:49 · answer #8 · answered by phockit47 4 · 0 4

see what the troops say about it, was on the news last night


http://video.msn.com/v/us/fv/msnbc/fv.htm??f=00&g=6171f107-d474-4e62-ae52-044060abf15c&p=hotvideo_m_iraq&t=c24&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/&fg=

2007-01-27 01:28:18 · answer #9 · answered by chumpchange 6 · 2 0

They are full of S***

2007-01-27 01:24:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers