English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

The little bag of shi.t is more socially acceptable
but with 3 million of the fkers in the country we are in that little bag.

2007-01-26 23:56:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

The bag

2007-01-27 13:48:24 · answer #2 · answered by papa.rumbo 1 · 1 0

Because throughout history, suicide bombers--including Guy Fawkes in England, Japanese kamikaze fighters in WW2, and many others--resulted in deaths, their own and that of innocents. Try not to minimize it.

2007-01-27 07:57:31 · answer #3 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 3 0

the bag of **** you can fertilise your garden with that, no sorry you can do the same with the body of a suicide bomber so they are both the same

2007-01-27 08:02:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The bag.

2007-01-27 11:30:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Hmm. suicide bombers don't ask questions like this?

2007-01-27 08:04:09 · answer #6 · answered by Zarathustra 5 · 0 1

the contemptible bag of sh1t is probably a christian

2007-01-27 08:02:35 · answer #7 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 0 4

One is more selfish than the other?

2007-01-27 07:59:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers