If you had to choose between love and no money or money and no love for the rest of your life, which would you choose?
2007-01-26 22:37:36 · 27 answers · asked by the choosen1 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Etiquette
Love wins all the time for me!
2007-01-26 22:40:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Are we talking about male-female relationships or having a family and the whole nine yards? If I had to choose between marrying a man w/ money but he didn't love me, but we had kids that did love me...I'd choose this over a man that had no money, did love me and we still had kids that love me. Why? Because I've been sick enough in my life to know that love doesn't get you healthcare at the hospital, love doesn't buy you medication that you need, and love doesn't get your broken wrist into a cast. It stays broken and deformed because you didn't have the money to pay a doctor to fix it. Love doesn't get you an appointment at the pediatricians office no matter how sick your child is. So, thanks to life's hard as*kicks, I choose money.
2007-01-27 12:34:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would choose not having money over love. Love is very important to me and I don't think my life would be worth it if I only had the money without the love. I would also feel so empty inside.
2007-01-27 14:52:14 · answer #3 · answered by Susie B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Choosing love from money is not for me, you can have all the money in the planet and if you don't have love your life is empty.
On the other hand love cannot feed an empty stomach if you have family and children. Just my opinion.
2007-01-27 08:10:13 · answer #4 · answered by linda c 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Damn This Is a Hard Question.... Let's see if i have love forever, i will have no money forever and will be homeless but still loved by whoever... If i choose money, then i would be rich, with food, house, a life and can travel to places and stuff etc... I wouldn't have love, but i would have lust and friendship (No love involved) so I choose Money...
2007-01-27 06:49:54 · answer #5 · answered by Issues of Mass Distruction ! 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally I would take the "love / no money" scenario because my life would be more meaningful and enjoyable. To be able to share my life with that special someone would be worth more than all of the money in the world. The saying "money can't by love" is true, although it can help and will often land you to have a very long line-up of people who will claim to love you, look at the big name starts who have money to burn - do they look happy to you? (Divorcing one every three months, trying to buy something that will make their lives seem worth living, etc)
No, for me love is more important - do doubts about it.
2007-01-27 06:49:04 · answer #6 · answered by Sabrina S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love for money
2007-01-28 16:53:49 · answer #7 · answered by Beauty isn't everything... 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Money. Love comes way to easy and hurts too much. Money makes the world go around!
2007-01-27 06:41:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've spent many years with love but no money. I'm glad to say now I have both. Money doesn't buy you happiness though. If you have to choose one, go for happiness. Both is nice but if it's just the one, definitely make it happiness.
2007-01-27 09:31:18 · answer #9 · answered by gerrifriend 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once I chose love with no money but now I think It's better to have money and no love ..
you cant imagine what a hard life I've had and I am still suffering ...
2007-01-27 06:42:00 · answer #10 · answered by Mysterious 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I choose money and no love. You can live without love but only money can pay bills and provide your basic needs.
2007-01-27 06:43:03 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋