Do you believe in God in scientific manner?

Answer 1

God gave Science to Man, but man has corrupted science to be God like
Knowledge is what the Good Lord provided us with
so all thanks to Him

Answer 2

God and science are like oil and vinegar. They do not mix. That said, I do respect Einstein's opinions. Einstein could not, for agnostic reasons, totally dismiss the concept of a creator. He simply drew the line at the concept of a "personal God." In other words, he abhorred the idea of a God that actually would take an interest in the life forms of one particular planet in a solar system in the Orion arm of the Milky Way Galaxy, among billions of galaxies, each containing on the average of 100 billion suns. The mysteries of the universe can not be explained by our limited imagination, and our propensity to think we are the crown of creation, in Einstein's opinion (which I share), has been proven time and again to be misguided. After all, religion was adamant that the entire universe revolved around the Earth. Even the Vatican, though loath to admit it, finally had to concede that this line of thinking is pure hogwash. Too bad that same religious authority didn't realize this fact when they persecuted Galilleo for stating the obvious. Copernicus opened the window to the vast realm of the cosmos, and his ideas changed the religious paradigm of the day for good. Ultimately, the religious dogma of the Bible will be marginalized for the mythical compilation that it is. This does not mean, however, that "God" does not exist. It just means we have no ******* clue as to what the term "God" actually means.

Answer 3

yes, i believe in God in a scientific, philosophical, logical, metaphysical manner. I have read some very convincing books.

1. Christian Ethics: Norman Geisler
2. Evidence for Christianity: Josh McDowell
3. I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist: Norman Geisler
4. Case for Christianity: C.S. Lewis.
5. Case for a Creator : Lee Strobel
6. apologetics.com

Answer 4

Science is the art of man trying to understand something by putting it through certain test that will produce a desired result.
I don't think an infinite GOD would fit into our finite box.

Answer 5

Scientific speaking I don't know what caused the big bang in the universe. So I theorized that it must be god that created it. My head hurts after I try to questioned myself who created God.

Answer 6

No.
Science adheres to two fundamental philosophies that, while necessary to science, are not practically applied in day to day life. The first is materialism, and the second is nominalism. Belief in God can be compatible with nominalism, but it is not compatible with materialism.

In science, it is better to reject truth than it is to accept error. Like I said, this is essential in science, but it creates a logical paradigm that cannot accomodate human cognition. We are inherently un-scientific in day to day life. If we applied strict science to all aspects of life, we wouldn't be able to function.

Answer 7

If by this you mean that which can be replicated by another in a different time and space, absolutely. In fact, it is far easier to do such w faith than w/ quantam mechanics which defines such a scientific proof.

Answer 8

Yes, unfortunately there is no relgion that includes God as a scientific creationist. And Jesus as his son.

As far as I know.

Answer 9

What God says is true and what God wants us to do we should do. Humans did not evolve because God created man in his image so if we change, we wouldn't be in Gods image.

Answer 10

Not in any way, shape, or form. The creation of god by man was more the work of mythology, superstition, and faerie tales.

Answer 11

I don't think there's any other way possible that our extremely organized world could have ever come to be without God, or, if you prefer, a "higher intelligence."