This would take the liability off honest ones.and keep the public to whom they are dedicated to protect and serve Unquestanably doing there jobs right or wrong with reliable proof no more injustace selectiv poloicing corruption preidst solving the publics fear of our Police
2007-01-26 13:11:03 · 7 answers · asked by ohnodanoh 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
not all cop cars highway patrole MARKED local "beat" cops .NOT undercover DEA S.V.U. and detective survalance and if the cams arnt live the public should be able to veiw them the tapes all of there content non edited Cause now the police only let there edited content to be seen but mostly they wont show any you know one of the cars in the rodny king beating had a dash cam but it never saw the ligt of day
2007-01-26 16:50:14 · update #1
it enough that they have it to themselves....
2007-01-26 13:29:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The idea has it's pros and cons, but the biggest con that comes to mind is that some left winger would scream that it was big brother and that they didn't want the general public to have that kind of access to criminal information. Thats also not taking into account that during the course of our duties, we run alot of driving and criminal background information that can;t be broadcast or especially re-broadcast. Peoples personal info would be out there, and that would be bad. Thats thinking outside of the box, A for effort. Even if you were trying to take a shot or two.
2007-01-29 22:21:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea thats really smart. So some crooks casing a bank for robbery would know when the cops leave the area?
I'd rather see a camera in every school classroom in the US, so we would know when some leftwing teacher was forcing her ideology on her students. And it would take the liability off of the honest ones.
2007-01-26 21:15:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sounds ok to me... but you would have problems with violation of privacy issues. Not all content is covered under the freedom of information act for obvious safety reasons.
2007-01-27 09:19:20 · answer #4 · answered by A.R.G.O.S. 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like having cameras with recorders in the cars. Live broadcasts sounds like a lousy idea.
2007-01-26 21:17:06 · answer #5 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It would be cool for me, but I wouldnt want them to do it because It would be dumb. Criminals would use it to there advantage.
2007-01-26 21:49:56 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I read something similiar on a bathroom wall once. It was written in ****.
2007-01-26 21:16:08 · answer #7 · answered by myhalo 1 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋