English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should not there be a minimum age for users on this forum?
The stupid questions are getting worse.
Most are not questions but attempts at incitement.
Many questions are just statements of fools.

2007-01-26 10:08:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

If only it could be enforced!

Then we would get rid of the under aged.

That would be about 20 % = I suppose.

2007-01-26 10:31:59 · answer #1 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0 2

Yes there should be a minimum age, I've also seen where pervs are going after those who identify their selves a being as young as 13. A lot of their questions are totally inane and so are a lot of their answers. Their answers make it obvious that they did not comprehend the question. If you ask Who thinks they assume you think that way. They are at risk and it makes one wonder where their parents are? Why their parents would allow them to be at risk or at the least a public display of ineptness. Don't their parents know there are progams to block their kids.

2007-01-26 12:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by Angelz 5 · 0 0

We ALL have the right of free expression.pay those questions you don't want to answer alone,a hundred questions or on here I don't answer or may any mind to, simple.why do you think you can control people? how is this to be accomplished anyway, they would simply lie saying that they were over 21. or they to go and get the peoples ID, at their home to make this happen?the have a lock on the computor so the child wont get to answer or ask questions, think about it, your asking something that CANT be down.I would fight ot the death for the right of someone to disagree with me, or act like a child the way your doing.how would this be accomplished? its would be Impossible.fool?Your the one asking a foolish question.By your reasoning we should do away with everything everyone doesnt like, their would not be a place here, as noone would or could ask questions.

2007-01-26 10:22:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Actually, I think it takes adults to ask the truely stupid questions.

Some kids ask some really deep questions that some adults seem to have lost a grasp on with all of their desperation to look like they are right. Hell, I'm pretty bright and I get to make myself look pretty stupid from time to time too.

Why do you have to be so uptight?

2007-01-26 14:23:20 · answer #4 · answered by Cheshire Cat 6 · 0 0

Not all of the questions you call stupid come from young people. But then you have the problem of age verficiation. Who's going to give a credit card or other id number to prove they can use Yahoo Answers?

Ignore the questions you don't like.

2007-01-26 10:19:41 · answer #5 · answered by milomax 6 · 1 2

I doubt the age will work but it may be a place to start. if I get a vote, then I vote yes!

I can't fathom why anyone who has no religion would spend so much time here belittling those who do!

A tough question with little resolve

2007-01-26 10:31:48 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

No thats not fair everyone whatever their age should be allowed to post answers and questions. And it's way unfair to presume that all of the idiotic answers/questions have been posted by young people, some could have been posted by older people.

2007-01-26 10:19:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Should you not assume that only the young ask stupid questions? As for the statements of fools, well, what can I say ...?

2007-01-26 10:17:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

There should be a minimum age of 21 before entering a church.

2007-01-26 10:24:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

If no one answers the stupid questions, they would soon loose interest in asking.

2007-01-26 14:05:17 · answer #10 · answered by Freedom 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers