the first one. second one has a big waist and weight issues
2007-01-26 01:07:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jim G 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
36 28 36
2007-01-26 04:50:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by gorakh a 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't like either, but if I had to choose, then 36-28-36.
I'd prefer 36-26-38 or 36-25-37 though. HTH : )
2007-01-26 11:13:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
36, 28,. 36 is better. Better yet is 36, 26, 36. Simming will slim your waist. My husband has lost to inches of his waist by swimming an hour every third day. He jogs and bicycles the other two days.
2007-01-26 01:11:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by Marissa 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
36, 28,. 36 is better
2007-01-26 05:07:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Krish 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
definately 36-28-36. that's more pear shaped and healthier, the other is more of an apple shape and tends to lead to more health problems over time. If you're a woman that is...
2007-01-26 01:11:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
36' 28' 36 is the best those are my measurements! A little thick but not too much. It also depends on the height of the woman also I'm 5'10, and if the woman you are talking about is 5'5 or shorter that is kinda outrageous..
2007-01-26 01:15:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
I'd go with the first one. A girl doesn't have to be a 28-waist for me, but a 39 is way too much.
2007-01-26 01:43:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Frank L 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Which ever you like, I know a guy who needs a girl to be 36-22-44. Small waist big butt! To each their own.
2007-01-26 02:52:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chrystal 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know this sounds totally lame, but beauty really is in the eye of the beholder. If you think either one is smoking hot, then you're right!
2007-01-26 01:10:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rocky B 2
·
1⤊
2⤋