English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A new attempt to move the UK's clocks forward by an hour's been launched in the House of Commons.

Tim Yeo's says lighter evenings would mean we use less gas and electricity which will help Britain reach its carbon cutting targets.

2007-01-25 23:21:46 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment

11 answers

Why change the habits of a wartime !

2007-01-25 23:37:21 · answer #1 · answered by wunceinawhile 6 · 0 1

issues are fantastic the way they are. i do no longer techniques shifting them forward/returned an hour as we presently do. it is not lots worry. i do no longer in user-friendly terms like the thought has been banded approximately that shifting the clocks forward to come again into line with CET - that's been tried earlier and it did no longer paintings. Doing this could advise that it may be too dark interior the mornings for babies going to college (to no longer point out the way it makes us experience often to have dark mornings!). it can not be so undesirable interior the south of england, yet for those individuals who stay extra north, it does no longer be friendly. So it is that it can be a enhance to employer or tourism? So what - youngsters secure practices is greater significant on the tip of the day! shop issues as they are, it ain't broke so it would not want fixing!

2016-11-27 19:46:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

In theory daylight savings time will in the shorter daylight months will provide more light later into the evening allowing for more activities that would have to be done in the dark hours to be done during daylight thus saving energy normally used to provide the additional light. To some degree this actually does work, but in recent years the effects have been much less dramatic as society is becoming more of a 24 hours society.

2007-01-26 02:39:05 · answer #3 · answered by Brian K² 6 · 1 0

If it means we'd see some daylight then yes!!! I never understood the need to put clocks back in the first place. The old arguement was about milk farmers and timing for milking cows, well most of that is automated now so it doesn't really make a difference anymore. Children going to school was another, but most get taken now, so no reason there either, plus its dark when they come home so surely thats as dangerous?
Set a time, leave it alone and we'd all get used to it!

2007-01-25 23:35:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It's madness, if it's lighter in the evening then it's darker in the morning surely, in which case the lights will be on in the morning instead or have I missed the point?

On a practical note though, does it really make sense to send our kids to bed in the daylight and to school in darkness?

What's next on this governments frantic attempts to cut emissions(not that I'm anti-environmentalism)but ours are tiny in comparison to the huge amount that certain other countries pump out.

It'll be Compulsory Woolly-Jumper wearing to reduce the amount of time we have to have the heating on next. Please. If they had an ounce of common sense between them we'd all be better off.

I have a few alternatives...

How about all the M.P's HAVE to walk/ride a bike/use public transport to get to work?
Make the use of energy saving light bulbs compulsory in all lights in all government buildings across the country?
Why don't they insist that all company cars-and certainly civic ones-should be hybrid so that they're better for the environment too? I mean I know they're not as swish as a Jaguar/Range Rover/Bentley but hey, we're doing it for the greater good aren't we?

Or maybe if someone invented something to harness all the hot air that the average politician produces and use it as an alternate energy source?

Now THAT would cut emissions.

2007-01-26 00:17:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It is insane they haven't done it before. Who wants to go to work in the dark and get home in the dark? The clocks should be moved forward 2 hours so we at least get some daylight in the evenings

2007-01-25 23:30:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It's a load of rubbish!!

How is it going to reduce accidents and save energy??
if its not dark in the evening then its dark in the morning and there are just as many accidents and we use just as much energy.

the real reason is that they want to bring us in a time line with the rest of europe, why i'm not quite sure but it's probably to do with having the same business hours.

don't be fooled,it's not for our benefit, it's for the benefit of large corporations and big business.

if it ain't broke don't fix it (my gran's old saying that i find is very true in most things!!)

2007-01-25 23:35:39 · answer #7 · answered by lola 5 · 0 1

We do it in Canada. Pray you don't do it. The morning after we move the clocks is usually one of the biggest days for traffic accidents in the year. It usually takes me a good week to adjust my sleep schedule.

2007-01-25 23:30:19 · answer #8 · answered by balderarrow 5 · 2 2

It's going to be dark at one end of the day!
Plus in Scotland in summer we'll have daylight at two in the morning!!!!!.

2007-01-27 03:06:48 · answer #9 · answered by Stef 4 · 0 1

There's only so much daylight in Winter. Does it really matter what end of the day it's at?

2007-01-25 23:30:31 · answer #10 · answered by Del Piero 10 7 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers