or are we really only "postponing their death", to be more correct.
ie "Emergency treatment at the seane postponed the deaths of 3 people"
It sownds so much nicer than "saved the lives of" don't you agree?
2007-01-25 21:52:25 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Other - Education
if i was the person being saved i wouldn't care what way you said it
2007-01-25 21:56:55 · answer #1 · answered by fergie 11 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I've done it twice. Saved or postponed, whichever term you want to use.
2007-01-25 23:41:30 · answer #2 · answered by Eat At The Y 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strange coming from an alleged seaman!
Be positive,lives are saved!!
2007-01-25 22:10:01 · answer #3 · answered by aburobroy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question is, did you watch Captain Pugwash just as a child - or as an adult?
2007-01-26 06:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are right
That Glenn is a bit of a pratt, obviously doesn't know what postpone means!! ROFLOL
2007-01-25 22:08:40 · answer #5 · answered by ArskElvis 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is possible to save lifes beause if someone is hanging from a cliff 100ft of the ground and you help get them back up then u have saved there life.
2007-01-25 21:56:42 · answer #6 · answered by Jack Bauer CTU 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
postponed the deaths? so does that mean an hour later they wer dead?
2007-01-25 22:03:37 · answer #7 · answered by Ace 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
saving there lifes sounds so much nicer to me
2007-01-25 22:02:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, saved there lives sounds so much nicer.
2007-01-25 21:57:16 · answer #9 · answered by Keira 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bit pedantic though!
2007-01-25 22:00:18 · answer #10 · answered by voodoobluesman 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋