"Really? Explain for me please, the biophysical aspects of love? You can explain the bio processes that occur when one feels the emotion, but what causes the emotion?"
Love is a result of natural selection and without it, procreation is dead in the water.
2007-01-25 21:20:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The logic goes a little like this: "I don't understand it, therefore God must have done it."
That's why I claim God created cell phones and the United States government. I'm just too lazy to learn how those work.
2007-01-25 21:25:07 · answer #1 · answered by Lee Harvey Wallbanger 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Yes, and procreation is nothing without it -- at least in humans! That is the reason that God made the man and woman to become "one flesh" and to desire becoming one, but only in marriage. So much comes from honest love towards someone. And it isn't just found within a male/female relationship.
My question for you is this: in your opinion, which would have had to come first, the feeling of love or procreation? And why would love be necessary for early procreation? Animals procreate all the time and do not feel "love."
2007-01-25 21:32:02 · answer #2 · answered by visitorparkingonly 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because anyone who believes the universe is 6,000 years old and that dinosaurs and humans lived together is a moron.
Next time, ask them to explain "biophysical." It's been my experience that most of them were either home-schooled by their idiot, gap-toothed parents or they were sent off to a Christian school run by a refugee from the Waco incident.
It's truly scary.
2007-01-25 21:37:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
They're trying to claim that love is a selfless act, and selflessness is counter-evolutionary. Since love acts against evolution, it should have been weeded out...
But in fact, love is what keeps a family together, and without it, we'd probably kill our children.
2007-01-25 21:29:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
not sure i understand your question.
but procreation does not need love.
And I do not believe that natural selection has anything to do with love.
I recon its more to do with hormones, sights and smells of the person you are attracted to.
2007-01-25 21:29:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Love is needed for Procreation? Then why are there animals?
2007-01-25 21:25:10 · answer #6 · answered by Darktania 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I didn't know that love was needed for pro-creation. I just thought that sex was the only way to pro-create. LOL
2007-01-25 21:30:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
love is not the drive to procreate. horomes are.
2007-02-02 17:54:09 · answer #8 · answered by Astroboy1979 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like some one could use a hug!
2007-01-25 21:28:16 · answer #9 · answered by Mr. Sniggles 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In evolution, everything dies.
All love dies, ergo
love proves evolution.
2007-01-25 21:26:12 · answer #10 · answered by Bad Liberal 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋