By definition, a third world war will involve the super-powers in two opposite camps, and if no price for victory is too high, then nuclear weapons will be used, how can they not.....which means world war three will be global suicide. The middle east trouble is merely in the heap of regional wars between rump states, when the super-powers collide, then come back and we'll talk World War.
Consider the following:
There are now more than 50,000 nuclear weapons, more than 13,000 megatons of yield, deployed in the arsenals of the US and Russia -- enough to obliterate a million Hiroshimas.
But there are fewer than 3000 cities on the Earth with populations of 100,000 or more. You cannot find anything like a million Hiroshimas to obliterate. Prime military and industrial targets that are far from cities are comparatively rare. Thus, there are vastly more nuclear weapons than are needed for any plausible deterrence of a potential adversary.
In the first 30 minutes of a full scale nuclear exchange 1.1 billion people will have been vaporized, mostly in the US, Europe, Russian, China and Japan. Another 1 billion would die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere would be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.
2007-01-26 13:11:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There will be no world war 3 because the people are scared enough to have one again. Day by day people are getting educated and civilized and also they are getting more and more sensitive. They can now understand others emotions and thats so cool.
Causing death is not what the most of people want. As we are using brain now a days more than past, there are no chances of having world war 3. But still the chances are there if a bunch of heartless and brainless leaders are given the chance to rule the world.
There are nothing but the unnecessary requirments of human which cause the wars and thats completely madness. We should change our thinking and be more practical and by being practical I means realizing the natural truths and live accordingly.
2007-01-26 04:49:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by ashutosh ddn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The best weapons to destroy everything is Nuclear, Iran, North Korea, Russia, India, Pakistan, US have it. I think this is enough to wipe everyone in this planet.
I think it is a good idea because I am struggling to pay my bills and can you tell when the world war 3 will come.
2007-01-26 04:32:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Cakebread 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Einstein once said that the third world war will be fought with nuclear arms, but world war four will be fought with sticks and stones. Comforting, huh?
2007-01-26 04:29:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by flamemaster_lang 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
with today's technology and man made diseases I don't think a world war 3 would last but a couple days we'd all eventually kill each other and ourselves with some kind of nuclear weapon that exceeds expectation
2007-01-26 23:28:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ray_Ray 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it has already begun and being fought in different parts of the world some where it is conventional and in many parts it is gorilla war however it will ultimately go nuclear.
2007-01-26 05:16:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by hm_pearl 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nuclear
Biological
Space weapons
2007-01-26 04:52:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
AIDS Virus & Malaria Mosquitoes
2007-01-26 05:56:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by king_alexander666 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, we have started with the conventional waepons but soon it will escalate to nuclear, and as flamethrower quoted will end up being sticks and stones
2007-01-26 05:33:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by wayne 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ones the make mushroom clouds and cause very long winters.
2007-01-26 04:26:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋