Do you think that NATO troops should go into Palestine so that Israel can withdraw?

Question

Then a U.N.-sponsored Jordanian mandate, ceasefire and economic aid can be introduced after stabilizing the area and stopping the infighting and some type of power-sharing agreement can be arranged, leading to semi-autonomous rule under a U.N./Jordanian administration, possibly leading to independece.

Answer 1

Personally, I think it should be a Mid-East force, but the problem with THAT is that most of the Mid-East countries have their own agenda for the Palestinians.

Palestine area is too much fo a mess that can be solved easily. Israel want a buffer zone due to mass of terrorism from that area. But that causes more Palestinian discontent. It's a catch-22 situation.

I don't see an easy solution at all.

Answer 2

What I really think is that the U.N., NATO and the rest of the world should leave poor Isreal alone! Let them fight their enemies. The struggles in the Middle East will never end until the rest of the world quits getting involved and just lets the factions thee duke it out. They will never stop until one group dominates all the rest anyway. We are delaying the inevitible by trying to stop one country from fighting another one. Besides, what give any other country or group of countries the right to tell Isreal or any other country for that matter, when they can defend themselves or if they can take over another country or not? Almost every country on this earth was formed by a series of wars or takeovers. That includes the U.S. and virtually every country in Europe and Asia. Since when did the country boundaries become locked? Why can't they still change?

Answer 3

no, i think NATO troops should go into Israel to stop the machine gunning down of Palestinian rock throwing children. and to keep the mosad from assassinating israeli leaders striving towards peace.