In the last local election for the race for governor, the question of should we withdraw our troops from Iraq was on the ballot. Now we are to send 21,500 more additonal troops to this region. Saddam is no longer in power, and Bin Laden has not been found.
why arent we looking for the person that blew up the World Trade Center? why not let the Iraqi people deal with Iraq, and let Americans deal with America?
2007-01-25 07:43:19 · 9 answers · asked by Lee B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
You know why we can't let the Iraqi people deal with Iraq, it is because they can't. The Iraqi people at this time do not possess the ability to control their country without our help. If we withdraw I hope you enjoy watching that country fall apart, with over 3000 soldiers deaths serving no purpose at all. I believe that if we withdraw, many terrorists will come out of Iraq, and possibly harm us here. We are going to have peace even if we have to fight for it.
2007-01-27 12:46:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We know who was behind the attacks on the WTC. It was George H.W. Bush. Thats why we aren't looking for the person responsible, we have already found him!
What were the results of that ballot measure by the way? The one about withdrawing the troops. Not sure exactly what a local ballot measure was supposed to do in relation to the Federal stance on having the troops there.
2007-01-25 07:59:36 · answer #2 · answered by Flynn380 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
BECAUSE THEY ARE DEFENDNG US!
BECAUSE THEY ARE DEFENDING US FROM THOSE WHO WOULD TAKE AWAY OUR RIGHTS.
IRAQIS THE ONLY BIG ENOUGH WAR TO KEEP OUR DEFENSE INDUSTRY HUMMING AND GIVE THE MILTIARY A NEED FOR FURTHER PAY AND EQUIPMENT ADVANCES.
THEY ARE DEFENDING YOUR RIGHT TO BE A CONSUMER!
THEY ARE DEFENDING YOU FROM GOING TO HELL AT THE HANDS OF ISLAMIC DEVIL WORSHIPPERS!
THEY ARE GETTING READY FOR ARMAGEDDON!
THEY COULDN'T FIND BIN LADIN SO THEY THOUGHT "WHAT THE HELL WE GOT TO DO SOMETHING" AND IRAQ LOOKS LIKE EASY PICKINGS!
THEY ARE DEFENDING OUR GAS PUMPS!
A MAN HAS GOTTA DO WHAT A MAN HAS GOTTA DO!
HOW AND THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO GET THREE HUNDRED MILLION AMERICAN SHOPPERS SUPPORTING YOU AND WORKING TOGETHER UNLESS YOU SCARE THE HELL OUT OF THEM!
HOW ELSE YOU GONNA HIDE THE FACT THAT YOUR DOLLAR IS NOW WORTH LESS THAN HALF OF WHAT IT WAS FROM BEFORE YOU ELECTED THIS GUY AS PRESIDENT!
HOW ELSE YOU GONNA HIDE THE FACT THAT THE THREE TOP JOB FILLINGS IN LAST 6 YEARS HAS BEEN BARTENDER AND BARMAIDS AND FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT?
HOW ELSE CAN YOU GET YOUR OIL ECONOMY BUDDIES INTO AN IRAQ THAT HAD ALREADY PRESOLD RIGHTS TO EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN WORLD EXCEPT THE US?
HOW ELSE YOU GONNA STOP A COUNTRY FROM NATIONALIZING ITS OIL AND FOR IT TO BE SOLD IN EUROS INSTEAD OF DOLLARS?
2007-01-25 08:37:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The president has the power to send troops anywhere in the world for 90 consecutive days. Unfortunately that number of days gets significantly greater the longer the congress chooses to fund the deployment. So we still have troops thereso long as the congress chooses to fund it.... Sgt. Stewart
2007-01-25 08:09:17 · answer #4 · answered by Stew 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We took down the last government and military in Iraq. It has now become our responsibility to make sure the new government and military can support themselves. Once that is assured, we can begin leaving.
2007-01-25 09:11:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ask Bush
2007-01-25 08:57:51 · answer #6 · answered by Richard D 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Commander in chief GW wants them there.
2007-01-25 12:47:51 · answer #7 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because they haven't been pulled out yet.
2007-01-25 10:08:18 · answer #8 · answered by liberal democratic republican 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why are we still in Germany? Why are we still in Japan?
2007-01-25 08:01:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋