What do you think about the emergence of the deep sea frilled shark? I hear that its been around for 380 million years. That means the shark is pre-historic or a living fossil. Doesnt this living organism contradict your faith as it swims around the depths of the ocean? Do you still disagree with the idea of dinosaurs roaming the Earth before humans. Dont you think if the creator did exist, he/she created the dinos first and not humans?
2007-01-25 06:48:27 · 8 answers · asked by Maikeru 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Cant believe a creationist would ask for proof that its that old! Thats like me saying prove the bible or the creation theory is true and based on reality!
2007-01-25 07:13:59 · update #1
I'm sure you think you have a point.
Finding a fish that no one knew existed only means they found a fish no one knew existed.
"I hear that its been around for 380 million years."
That is not a statement of fact.
Check your sources, amass your proofs and then we can talk.
BTW There is no problem with dinosaurs and the Bible ....unless you wish to make one.
2007-01-25 06:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the shark is still here so it isn't prehistoric since we're not living in pre-history. The Bible mentions dinosaurs & also clearly states that God created the animals before He created man.
2007-01-25 15:08:38 · answer #2 · answered by wanda3s48 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you know if the earth was millions of years old the oceans would be nothing but salt by now? Well, your pre-historic shark is swimming in the oceans so I guess we're back where we started.
2007-01-25 14:59:10 · answer #3 · answered by adrian♥ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
creationists don't think. they believe in creation so they don't have to.
That is why it is called creationism. because they can just create whatever answer they can imagine would fit the question without having to be bogged down by a little thing called fact, proof and logic like the rest of us are.
2007-01-25 15:09:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bible doesn't say anything about there not being dinosaurs. In fact it talks about dragons which might very well be refering to dinosaurs.
2007-01-25 15:09:34 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You misheard. They said 3800 years, not 380 million, i dont care they sound nothing alike - the people on the news know the world is only 6000 years old - right?
Back me up fellow cretinists.
2007-01-25 15:04:37 · answer #6 · answered by Goodly Devil 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It doesn't shake my faith one iota.
Happy swimming, shark!
2007-01-25 15:07:38 · answer #7 · answered by Char 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No problem, sure.
2007-01-25 14:56:37 · answer #8 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋