If you don't go on the BBC website and find out about it.
2007-01-25 02:02:24 · 9 answers · asked by Mini-man23 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Engineering
It will only contribute to global warming, might as well save the taxpayers money and shoot the bad guy.
2007-01-27 16:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd just come in from the cold when I read it. I thought "... Mmmm, cosy".
If it's an RF system, you'd be safe from it if clothed in metal impregnated cloth. Of course, you'd need a balaclava too.
I don't believe their claims that it is non-lethal. If you've got a pace-maker and that thing sweeps by you... Game Over my friend!
Cheers.
2007-01-25 02:19:55 · answer #2 · answered by chopchubes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I find it rather sad that all of Humanities scientific creativity and invention is focussed on better and more efficient ways to butcher each other.
If you think that this is non lethal then you will believe in anything won't you?
2007-01-25 03:10:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So long as it isn't used for torture it could be a good alternative to shooting people dead.
Maybe the money would be better spent ensuring they have to do neither.
2007-01-25 02:54:34 · answer #4 · answered by mesun1408 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's great. Using this weapon, the military can engage hostile targets who may be embedded with civilians and children and not risk innocent casualties.
2007-01-25 02:07:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You can bet your bottom dollar they are developing a lethal version at the same time!
2007-01-25 02:12:15 · answer #6 · answered by stgoodric 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes people rather warm, might be useful in this weather,
2007-01-25 02:05:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Big target for an RPG.
2007-01-25 02:12:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Haven't seen it in an news in the US.
2007-01-25 02:08:18 · answer #9 · answered by Gene 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋