Liberals show me that they are for appeasing the enemy. You want the soldiers to be safe? I am a soldier and if I wanted a safe job, I would have gotten a job at Wal Mart. I volunteered and I was not drafted.
2007-01-24 23:48:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Damn Good Dawg 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
You can't win impilies someone looses and that would be us.
Liberals cry for freedom but when it gets tough they want to run.
You also seem to forget if we do run away what kind of message we are sending to terrorist. All you have to do is kill of few Americans and they run away.
Iraq will take time and Bush said that. Yet you are just focusing on a 6 words.
Liberals in Congress call for more troops Bush wants to send more troops and now they don't want to send them.
Time to wake up to the reality this war on Muslim terrorist was not all about 9/11. This is not all about bin laden.
When the explosive expert feld from the 1st WTC attack he went to Iraq.
The terrorist mastermind of the killers of Klingoffer was found in Iraq.
Now we have evidence that Iran is sending money, men, and explosives. So this not just us and Iraqis fighting.
You want to start deleting false statements how about conservatives don't care about the poor.
When the proof is out that Conservative Christians far out give liberals in both time and money.
One more question for you to think. The comment I keep hearing about Bush is how the world hates us. We were love by the world under Clinton. Our reward was 9/11. Now do you really believe if we pull out of Iraq that Muslim terrorism will stop and not come here again.
2007-01-24 23:57:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Liberals or Conservatives,
All of you are making excuses why you stand for what you believe and I think you all have an "ego" issue going on that has nothing to do with victory. Shoot,Move, and communicate! It sounds better for victory than fart, piss, and deficate for getting the crap knocked out of you. On a short note, I don't care about anybodys political arena because only veterans who are there now should have the voice wether or not they should be "there" and all of these people who want our "troops" to come home would gladly beat them up at a college "frat" party because they are "baby killers". These are the same "educated" people who have convinced everybody to segragate themselves as "african-americans" or "latino-americans" or blah,blah,blaah.. so as to avoid being just a normal ,humble, and proud american citizen who does not need a label to justify their ingrediants. JUST BE YOURSELF! This message is brought to you by anybody who is an American with no affiliation to any party including Republicans, Democrats, Independants, or whatever political party who screwed this country up and reminded us not to get along .
I am a regular old american who wonders if our Country's founders meant for us to categorize their ignorance in the Declaration of Independance so we could later argue about conservative and liberal issues based on race,gender, and religeon. This country was founded as a Republic if you remember in the pledge of allegiance(...or was that just indoctrination during the cold war?.) Regardless, we ended up in a Democracy (which historically does not last very long.) We need to wage a war far more disgusting than the insurgents and outright slaughter those who dare raise a fist to us in Iraq (just like our strongest ally in Europe...France...yes France... did in Algeria during the battle of the Casbah in the 1950's against the same people and war we are fighting now...except they won militarily, but lost by...wait a minute... by the same public opinion we have now in the United States). I think our country is too young to have progressed this fast technologically because too many idiots are still defending the tree's while living in log cabins.. P.s. I do have two combat tours under my belt so burn their bridges and let the fire lead the way! Hopefully when Hillary Clinton wins the presidential election, and unites the world like Bill did, then a burly, loveable, Islamo-facist like Osama can marry Chelsea and bash her head in at some soccer stadium for their "honeymoon" in Afganistan in front of a cheering crowd because she looked at the moon without permission. Remember the Crusades in Europe tried to stop this outright attack on Jews and Christians a thousand years ago...and it was not some blood lust by the Christians, but some Christians trying to stop the blood lust. Even then, the Jews were attacked because they killed Jesus Christ, according to the Jew who pulled the trigger, because Jesus was a Jew as well. Does anybody see a pattern developing here? Nothing can stop a fight except victory by the first punch thrown(all else is a round number by pretty women to distract people from the blood that was spilled). Jason
2007-01-25 00:17:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by combatsignaler 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
It seems that folk like to label each other as this or that. I do not think that the administration has effected a working policy for Iraq, yet I do not think we can pull out and leave the area to turn into a terrorist training center. I will support any liberal or Conservative who has a workable plan to stabilize Iraq and draw down our human and financial support.
2007-01-25 00:05:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by david42 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq's destiny is in the hands of the Iraqi people, not the US. They are the ones who have to settle their sectarian disputes, build an army, police force, reconstruct their oil depots, etc. The Iraqi government has to take charge of the responsibilities given them and stop relying on the US to spoon-feed them. As for winning and losing, that's irrelevant. Bush has always made claim of "victory". That's ridiculous. We have no business there since Saddam is gone, no WMD were found, no 9-11 conspiracy, etc. Our business is done and we should get out, period. Bush is the one that makes those divisive remarks. I think he's forgotten this is a democracy. Based on the polls, his positions are being opposed by liberals and conservatives alike.
2007-01-24 23:51:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by gone 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
OK, is the statement that "most liberals" want to lose in Iraq more to your liking?
Because the constant barrage of anti-war, WMD "lie", 650,000 dead, Gitmo "concentration camp", timetable, "redeployment", pull out now rhetoric has only served to impair our ability to win. It has encouraged our enemies, and made our allies and those who need our help question our commitment, thus further weakening the effort.
And if undermining and weaking our effort, while supporting and encouraging the enemy is not considered "wanting to lose", then I don't know what is.
2007-01-24 23:50:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's not you, it's the ones you've elected to be your representatives in congress that everyone hates. You're fine. There's no problem with you. You're informed and erudite. Quite sure of what you think and why. Not swayed by the winds of political change. And you care more about those dear soldiers than they care about themselves. How gallant of you. Such a great, witty, caring person wrapped up in all that knowledge. How do you do it?
2007-01-24 23:54:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by CJohn317 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
So what you want is to have a war with nothing bad happening. Sorry snowflake, war isn't like that. And if you really do not think you guys have given mountains of moral support to our enemies, your insane. They know that you are weak and all they have to do is stick it out to win. Why not, thanks to your type in Vietnam the North decided not to surrender after Tet and they won. America today is not worth the sacrifice of the young men and women that have died in the war on terror and in Iraq. Most of America today is brainwashed to entitlements and an unwillingness to sacrifice for the common good. All I see is greed and grasping, clutching pigs wallowing in their much and just waiting for the farmer to come and slaughter them. Time the betters willing to stand and die for your worthless butts save themselves and let you all burn and die.
2007-01-24 23:50:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by zombiefighter1988 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Some people say it because they are trolls, and just want to provoke a reaction, and some people say it because it seems to them that liberals all speak against the war and some people equate speaking against it with wanting to lose. Of course, the word ALL is seldom accurate, for anything.
2007-01-25 00:18:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No you just want to stand back and take every else's rights away. Then when Bush screws up you come out looking sparkling clean.
Why should such a response be deleted? Just because you want it to be deleted? Everyone's opinion is welcome here including yours. Last time I checked this wasn't a socialist community.
2007-01-25 00:15:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋