I am all about pulling the troops out. Once the last man has left Iraq, we drop a nice big nuke on them.
2007-01-24 23:29:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Damn Good Dawg 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
I think that no matter what you do all those different sects will fight like dogs over whoever is in "their territory." I think it is noble what the americans are trying to do, but it will come to no avail. There are more Iraqis than americans. I think the Americans would need to stay for at least 20 yrs...but they obviously wont be that patient. Besides which if they did they did the Iraqis would kick them out. I think that they need to divide the different sects of Iraq into different countries but that has to com from within Iraq.
2007-01-25 00:30:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Label all Sunni's the aggressor? I think you can not comprehend the magnitude of such a position. That would be like Iran labeling all Roman Catholics "the agressor". It isn't like the Sunni sect of Islam is some little radical splinter cell. That is a huge demographic. There are some radical Sunnis just as there are radical Shia...as there are Wahabees for that matter.
2007-01-24 23:24:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by ldeweyjr 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
between the proper military commanders who understood terrorism become Gen. Anthony Zinni. In 2000 he advised congress, "almost one 1/2 of the 28 known terrorist agencies have operational internet sites in the area. Afghanistan has emerged as a catalyst for community instability providing sanctuary, help, and preparation centers to a turning out to be type of extremist aspects.” Zinni become commander of CentCom and Commandant of the Marine Corps earlier 9/11. He become appointed by technique of G.W. Bush as particular envoy to the middle East and advised Bush their become no probability from Iraq. He become fired. Now all of us recognize that he become correct about Afghanistan and proper about Iraq. Zinni noted as for extra troops in Afghanistan to wrestle the insurgency there. He stated individuals want to hearken to a extra effective rationalization of why we are in Afghanistan. the challenge we've in Afghanistan is battling the Taliban from taking up. If we go away without battling this we are able to once lower back have a breeding floor for terrorism in Afghanistan.
2016-12-03 00:49:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sunni the aggressors?. Why?. Are they on U.S. soil?. C'mon. This is Iraq. Sunnis are Iraqi's. It's the American troops who are stepping on Iraqi soil. So who are the aggressors?.
Wake up, and open that damn dictionary. See what "aggressor" means, you dumb Bush-head.
2007-01-25 00:34:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by roadwarrior 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Support the President. He needs to make this come to a desired ending. Losing control over there is a victory for our enemies
2007-01-24 23:56:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by gary t 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes, they are the agressor in this case. Next week it'll be the Shi'ites turn to be the agressor. Maybe our troops should just take out anyone found sporting a weapon.
2007-01-24 23:20:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
It's impossible to tell between Sunni & Shi'ite's. It's not like they wear colored bandannas or tie their shirts or anything. Even then, not all of them are bad.
2007-01-24 23:37:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by amg503 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I support pres Bush whatever he say's I say go for it.
2007-01-24 23:42:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by lonetraveler 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
huh???
"who were sent there to help them rebuild their country"
Are you serious?
Rebuild it after what???
After you bombed the place to bits !!!!
Wake up dude. You invaded their country, you bombed it, destroyed the infrastructure and now you complain when they shoot back !!!
I can't believe you Americans some times.
2007-01-24 23:31:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by TonyB 6
·
3⤊
5⤋