English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Jesus did not speak english, but his original language spoken at his time is Aramaic language. now see for yourself who is your God from that Aramaic-english dictionary. type down the word God:
http://www.peshitta.org/lexicon/

and if you insist that Jesus did not speak Aramaic but hebrew, then that's an evidence for you that he spoke Aramaic NOT hebrew.
http://scriptures.lds.org/bd/a/109

believe it or not this is your God who created you, the God of old testimony and the God of all prophets of God. anyone disbelieve after this has to be very stubborn. truth has been revealed from your God by sending you the Quran.

2007-01-24 22:26:33 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

Yup.He did worshipped Allah.

2007-01-27 16:43:17 · answer #1 · answered by Green Lantern 4 · 0 0

In the time of Jesus very few understood Hebrew language at all and of course the majority spoke Aramaic,millions of people speak the English language but there are many different faiths and beliefs,so what does your comment prove?

2007-01-24 22:33:04 · answer #2 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 0 0

"In worry-free With Conservative Christians and the historic Protestant Creeds, we've self conception— a million. That God is the Sovereign author, upholder, and ruler of the universe, and that he's eternal, all-helpful, omniscient, and omnipresent. 2. That the Godhead, consists of God the daddy, Christ the Son, and the Holy Spirit. 3. That the Scriptures are the inspired revelation of God to human being adult adult males; and that the Bible is the only rule of religion and practice. 4. That Jesus Christ is very God, and that He has existed with the daddy from all eternity. 5. That the Holy Spirit is a private being, sharing the attributes of deity with the daddy and the Son. 6. That Christ, the note of God, grew to modify into incarnate in the course of the tips-blowing concept and the virgin beginning; and that He lived an noticeably sinless life precise right here on earth. 7. That the vicarious, atoning lack of life of Jesus Christ, as immediately as for all, is all-sufficient for the redemption of a lost race. 8. That Jesus Christ arose extremely and genuinely from the grave. 9. That He ascended extremely and genuinely into heaven. 10. That He now serves as our propose in priestly ministry and mediation in the previous the daddy. 11. That he will go back in a premillennial, own, coming near second creation. 12. That guy replaced into created sinless, yet through utilizing his next fall entered a state of alienation and depravity. 13. That salvation through Christ is through utilizing grace on my own, through faith in His blood. 1a87ff679a2f3e71d9181a67b75a87ff679a2f3e71d9181a67b7542122c2122c. That the front upon the present life in Christ is through utilizing regeneration, or the present beginning. 15. That guy is justified through utilizing faith. 16. That guy is sanctified through utilizing the indwelling Christ in the course of the Holy Spirit. 17. That guy must be glorified on the resurrection or translation of the saints, even as the Lord returns. 18. That there'll be a judgment of all human being adult adult males. 19. That the gospel is to be preached as a witness to each and every of the international."[4]

2016-10-16 02:08:44 · answer #3 · answered by debbie 4 · 0 0

as i answered b4 2 a similar ques 2 urs i say it again
One unexpected thing I got out of watching "The Passion of the Christ" is its affirmation that Jesus never uttered the word "God." Instead, he called upon the Creator using a name that is very close to what I and other Muslims often evoke, namely, the word "Allah." (The Aramaic word for God is transliterated as "alaha.")

2007-01-24 22:32:23 · answer #4 · answered by NS 5 · 1 1

befor christ the almighty god was to talk to the people, as he said to moses that " iam the god of abraham, isaac and jacob all these was happened before christ.But when christ came to this world he took all the burden of the people.As far as u r question jesus christ sitting beside father and ready to came to this world again but this time not like a baby but like a lion,get ready for the action.

2007-01-24 22:38:27 · answer #5 · answered by prem k 2 · 0 1

He worship Allah, but not Allah of Islam

I worship Allah, i am arab and when i pray i say Allah which mean God in Arabic, but this is not Allah of Islam
Islam is FAKE

2007-01-24 22:49:57 · answer #6 · answered by الحقيقة 4 · 1 1

oh , not another nut job with more propaganda. its just getting to bee too much!

2007-01-24 22:32:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I am often asked, Why I left Islam?. As absurd as it may be, some Muslims cannot even allow themselves to think that leaving Islam is an option, or even possible. They rather think that those who leave Islam are paid Jewish agents than accept the fact that people have freedom to think and some may even think that Islam is not for them. The following are my reasons:

Until few years ago I used to think that my faith in Islam was not based on blind imitation but rather was the result of years of investigation and research. The fact that I had read a lot of books on Islam, written by people whose thoughts I approved of and delving into philosophies that were within my comfort zone, emphasized my conviction that I had found the truth. All my biased research confirmed my faith. Just like other Muslims I used to believe that to learn about anything one has to go to the source. Now you may thing that the source of Islam is the Quran and the hadith. That might be so in theory. But in practice few Muslims read these books to understand them. Muslims get their their information about Islam by reading the books written by scholars of Islam. These are apologetic books that deceitfully try to portray Islam in the best lights, showing that Muhammad was a holy man and the Quran is a "scientific book". Therefore, I felt no need to look elsewhere in order to find the truth, as I was convinced that I have already found it. As Muslims say “Talabe ilm ba’d az wossule ma’loom mazmoom”. The search of knowledge after gaining it is unwise.

Now I realize this was a mistake. What if we want to learn the truth about one of these dangerous cults? Is it enough to depend only on what the cult leader and his deluded followers say? Wouldn’t it be prudent to widen our research and find out what other people have to say about them? Going to the source makes sense only in scientific matters, because scientists are not “believers”. They do not say something because they have blind faith. Scientists make a critical analysis of the evidence. It is very much different from religious approach that is based entirely on faith and belief.

I suppose it was my acquaintance with the western humanistic values that made me more sensitive and whetted my appetite for democracy, freethinking, human rights, equality, etc. It was then that when I reread the Quran I came across injunctions that were not on a par with my newfound humanistic values, I was distressed and felt uncomfortable to read teachings like these:


Q.3:90
But those who reject Faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of Faith,- never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have gone astray.
Q.16: 106
Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief,- except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith - but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.


One may think that the dreadful penalty mentioned here pertains to the next world. But Muhammad made sure that these people received their penalty in this world as well:

9.14
Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers,

There are also Hadiths that clearly says " So, wherever you find them, kill them, for there will be a reward for their killers on the Day of Resurrection."
Elsewhere we read:
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 260:


Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn 'Abbas, who said, "Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, 'Don't punish (anybody) with Allah's Punishment.' No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, 'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.' "

I found many tales of brutality of Muhammad like this story:
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 261:


Eight men of the tribe of 'Ukil came to the Prophet and then they found the climate of Medina unsuitable for them. So, they said, "O Allah's Apostle! Provide us with some milk." Allah's Apostle said, "I recommend that you sh ould join the herd of camels." So they went and drank the urine and the milk of the camels (as a medicine) till they became healthy and fat. Then they killed the shepherd and drove away the camels, and they became unbelievers after they were Muslims. When the Prophet was informed by a shouter for help, he sent some men in their pursuit, and before the sun rose high, they were brought, and he had their hands and feet cut off. Then he ordered for nails, which were heated and passed over their eyes, and they were left in the Harra (i.e. rocky land in Medina). They asked for water, and nobody provided them with water till they died.

And from Partial Translation of Sunan Abu-Dawud Book 38, Number 4339

Narrated Aisha, Ummul Mu'minin:
The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) Said: The blood of a Muslim man who testifies that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle should not lawfully be shed except only for one of three reasons: a man who committed fornication after marriage, in which case he should be stoned; one who goes forth to fight with Allah and His Apostle, in which case he should be killed or crucified or exiled from the land; or one who commits murder for which he is killed.

2007-01-24 22:33:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers