English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-24 21:56:59 · 9 answers · asked by fastfreedombailbonds 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

These answewrers are wrong Christ taught us that we are blessed or not not by what enters our mouths but what comes FROM it.

2007-01-24 22:33:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Does it really matter in this day and age when meat is contaminated with organisms that are killing off the population.
Finding clean food is becoming a world problem and discovering what Jesus ate or did not eat is beyond the point of common sense. It seems to be spending more time defining organic is more credible.

2007-01-25 06:02:50 · answer #2 · answered by Asher H 2 · 0 0

Of course.. but only of the types described in the Torah, Talmud, & Bible as fit for eating ... (Diatary law.. or Kosher to you people that never read yer own book)
There are meats & fish that are both forbidden.. Jewish Torah and Xtian Bible... (and I dont wanne even talk about shellfish sheesh strictly off limits in any version.. have fun wit tha main lobster and clams .. yer going to hell in any bible LOL if yer of that type faith.. luckily I'm pagan myself)

Jesus was never a christian ya know he was a Hebrew... A JEW.. Sheesh...

(why do I feel like I'm dealing with Jerry's kids at times like these?)

2007-01-25 06:10:16 · answer #3 · answered by darchangel_3 5 · 0 0

Both!

The 'Last Supper" would have been a roast lamb with herbs meal. The 'bread and wine' were just side dishes.

The meat He would have eaten would be lamb (sheep meat generally), goat meat, beef but no pork.

When He fed the 500 with the loaves and fishes, he would have shared in the meal too.

2007-01-25 06:00:59 · answer #4 · answered by jemhasb 7 · 1 1

Fish and bread - most likely- he blessed the fish and the loaves- and fed the 5000-and olives and almonds were very common then t00-D

2007-01-25 06:02:17 · answer #5 · answered by Debby B 6 · 0 0

he was a jew so he probably ate all meat but pork.

2007-01-25 06:01:48 · answer #6 · answered by Another۞Human 2 · 1 0

Yes, definitely fish.He was Jewish though, so he wouldn't have eaten pork.

2007-01-25 06:00:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

his meals consisted of what most alcoholics have...... bread and wine...

2007-01-25 06:00:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

He was human wasn't he?






---

2007-01-25 06:01:06 · answer #9 · answered by Catholic Philosopher 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers