there is a hullabaloo in Kenya ,Africa regarding the same. some argue that there was a clear line between Kings and Prophets in bible times, while others claim that the on;ly way to take care of ills that bedevil Africa like Corruption is to bring leadrs with a spiritual background. the also add that we should bring the "kingdom" of God to government.wha do you think?
2007-01-24 20:06:00 · 7 answers · asked by mkenya halisi 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It was my understanding that our fore fathers said to keep it seperated.
2007-01-24 20:12:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i comprehend you purely asked for solutions from Atheist and Agnostics, yet i'm an Christian and that i could opt to communicate to that remark. between the main significant motives that adult males and girls folk come to God is by the fact they are in seek of exhilaration, convenience, love and popularity that they can't discover interior the organic international no matter what proportion drugs, how lots alcohol and how lots intercourse they work together in. they have nevertheless been left with an element of their hearts it particularly is empty. some end, pass a distinctive direction and discover God. some end and proceed living a reasonably empty existence yet giving up the drugs, alcohol and indiscriminate intercourse. some proceed with that existence, declare to be Christians, yet do no longer stroll the training of God of their lives, and a few do exactly no longer care and stay the place they are. this is not as much as me or every person else to entice any conclusions approximately ideals or existence varieties. i could purely ask which you no longer make a judgment approximately Christians based on the habit of a few. Be blessed.
2016-11-01 05:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Religious people are supposed to be concerned only with bringing glory to god, not themselves....seeking election is seeking the approval and admiration of other people....it's unholy. The wise folk elected to government are just supposed to listen to the even wiser religious leaders.....either way, the religious leaders end up in charge, so you know what? Why not? Let 'em be elected to whatever they want, they're going to end up spreading suffering and war either way, why not get it over with?
2007-01-24 20:14:19 · answer #3 · answered by Doc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Religious leaders were instrumental in organising the genocide in Rwanda. MAny are on the "wanted" list as war criminals.
It clearly demonstrate that they are indeed ready to seek elective posts in governement.
Ramen !
2007-01-24 20:18:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a little late to question that now we still elect people who usually have religious affiliations of some sort so what about electing an economically poor individual to represent the have nots for a change.
2007-01-24 20:18:17 · answer #5 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The shoddy Sheik is trying to do it in Australia as well.
2007-01-24 20:19:51 · answer #6 · answered by Screamin' Banshee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AMEN
2007-01-24 20:11:37 · answer #7 · answered by Tribble Macher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋