2007-01-24 12:07:43 · 13 answers · asked by elana l 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Isa (pbuh)
There have been many interpretations of the bible throughout time. The King James version was just the English standardized form. That had been translated from previous text.
Something is always lost in translation.
2007-01-24 12:17:08 · answer #1 · answered by Layla 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus Christ the Son of God, Jesus the son of Joesph, Christ Jesus
well it was not the only translation of the times
Early Modern English Bible translations are those translations of the Bible which were made between about 1500 and 1800, the period of Early Modern English. This was the first major period of Bible translation into the English language. It began with the dramatic introduction of Tyndale's Bible and included the landmark King James Version and Douai Bibles. It included the first "authorised version", known as the Great Bible (1539); the Geneva Bible (1560), notable for being the first Bible divided into verses; and the Bishop's Bible (1568), which was an attempt by Elisabeth I to again create an authorised version.
2007-01-24 20:28:23 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus is the Latin translation of Joshua. The King James bible is fairly new there have been many and varied translations. Many, much older then the King James version. Note the word version. The Coptic text is 1000 years older.
2007-01-24 20:13:41 · answer #3 · answered by Jim R 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus' Name was Yeshewa. that's what they called Him when He walked the earth.
The King James Version of the Bible was written in the year 1611. So yes, they did have it in the 1800's.
2007-01-24 20:13:50 · answer #4 · answered by stpolycarp77 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the Hebrew it would have been Yeshua.
The King James bible came out around 1611 so, yes, people had it in the 1800s.
god bless
2007-01-24 20:12:23 · answer #5 · answered by happy pilgrim 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
His original Hebrew name was Yeshua. If you prefer the Islamic view his name was Isa.
I'm not too sure about the KJV being the only translation around in the 1800s.
I think you'd have to specift who "they" are.
2007-01-24 20:19:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes that was Jesus' real name. look up some books on roman/jewish historians. they talk about Jesus dieing and such. it was the king james bible because king james had the scholars put together a bible.
2007-01-24 20:12:11 · answer #7 · answered by Droppinshock 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Isa son of Marium
2007-01-24 20:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by Kimo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There were afew other versions around. Jesus's real name is Jesus.
2007-01-24 20:16:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obama
2007-01-24 20:13:01 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋