Many have been found, Homo ecectus, Homo Habilis, Australopithecine etc etc. Were these just work in progress? did god make these first but then decide he could improve on the design? or were the remains just put here as kind of divine joke on us? Please explain....
2007-01-24 11:14:32 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I have checked the "many" factor...Not including the species already mentioned.. Homo hiedelbergensis, Homo geogicus, Australopithecus gari, Austra' africanus, Austra' afarenisis...I could go on. How do you explain their existance?
2007-01-24 14:03:24 · update #1
They don't explain, they deny. Anything that doesn't fit into a literal interpretaion of the Bible just doesn't exist to them.
An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. Now turn the other cheek and try to find the truth. The Bible is so full of contradictions that only an idiot would take it as literal truth.
2007-01-24 11:24:43 · answer #1 · answered by Dim 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cool, some belongings you suggested that human beings do not seem to have a lot of a use for. you recognize there are various creationists who imagine God created with the help of evolution. both way it does no longer have a lot of an impact on each and all of us's on a daily basis residing. that is a pink herring.
2016-12-03 00:24:39 · answer #2 · answered by kwiatkowski 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creation might be a joke in your eyes, but the joke is on the evolutionists. They don't critique each one another, they don't question their own theory, they believe every bit of nonsense that supports their theory, if they do an experiment which produces as result which is contrary to their beliefs they discredit the experiment, and they use ridicule as a "valid" scientific argument to Creationists.
Do different races have slightly different physical characteristics? Of course they do. So how do you know these are "humans evolving" and not just different races of humans?
2007-01-24 11:33:07 · answer #3 · answered by Bad bus driving wolf 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Explained by the simple fact that there is no evolutionary progression.
Think about it: if I give you your 5 billion years for the earth, you still have only 2-3 billion for life itself, and at most a million for humans themselves. In the last 6,000-10,000 years we should, therefore, BE SEEING evidence of evolutionary changes/improvements in the humans we find. Nope. None. As I read once, a Neanderthal could walk down a street in New York in a suit and a tie and no one would know who he was.
The same holds for every other fossil found--it appears in the fossil record suddenly and fully formed AND as we know it now. No changes. Weird, huh?
2007-01-24 11:23:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
There IS no conflict. NOWHERE in the Bible does it say the earth is only 6000 years old. That's a human assumption. And God is perfectly capable of creating man from dirt over a long period of time USING evolution.
2007-01-24 11:22:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
They either deny them, claim they're part of a conspiracy, ignore them, or use some explanation that has long since been proven incorrect.
2007-01-24 11:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by . 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
God moves in mysterious ways...
2007-01-24 11:22:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to the answers I've seen on here, they are all hoaxes
whatever.....
see above
2007-01-24 11:19:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL You ever watch the NBA, alot of big boned people walking around.
2007-01-24 11:19:37 · answer #9 · answered by TULSA 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Placed there by God to test their faith, yadda yadda dinosaurs, yadda schmackety blah.
2007-01-24 11:21:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋