the "war" in Iraq should NEVER have been started.
the war was in Afghanistan...PERIOD. where is Ben Laden? why have we not finished what we started there?
oil, that's why. and you "oh it's not about oil" idiots don't get it. you have no idea how important oil is. Oil makes this damn world go around.
it's NOT JUST GASOLINE.
oil is used to make ALL of these things:
Brake Fluidm, Boats, Oil Filters, Car battery cases, Car Bodies, Motorcycle helmet,Gasoline, Jet Fuel, Diesel fuel, Tires, Paint, Wire Coating,Asphalt Highways, Anti-freeze, Seats,Candles, Shower Doors, Roofing,
Milk Jugs, Vinyl, Wallpaper, Trash Bags,Ice Cube Trays, Electric Blankets, Toilet Seats, VCR & CassetteTapes, Shampoo, Curtains, House Paint, Fan Belts, Telephones,Detergent, Bowls, Glue,Flooring, Carpets, Sofa and Chair, Clothesline, Fertilizer, Insect Repellent,Artificial Turf, Weed Killer, Insect Killer, Awnings, Containers, Garden Hose, Toothbrush, Deodorant, Eye Glasses, Nail Polish, Hair Spray, Sweaters,Shoes, Sunglasses, Crayons,Pajamas, Pillows, Combs,Lipstick, Shampoo, Medicine Containers, ETC
basically a SH!T load of stuff.
if you don't think Iraq is about the oil, your lost.
2007-01-24 07:24:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by ☆MWφM☆ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. We must build a wall around America with motion activated machine guns because terrorists will mix in with refugees coming here and knowing that we can't allow any more people in.
I was going to ask you to explain exactly which court precedents have validated your view of the constitutionality of the Iraq war which Congress approved and by what logic you say soldiers who vonunteered to be in the US military are not enjoying their freedom. Lots of them want to be there and even volunteer to go back, so if we leave Iraq you are denying them their right to enjoy being part of the attempt to give the Iraqi people the same freedoms we have here.
Are you a racist and think Iraqis are all bad? They deserve to be free too.
As for WMD, we have found enough in Iraq to kill over a million people. Just google: Iraq chemical weapons factory. If you want the truth, Google will show you that we have found Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, enough to kill over a million people. How much is enough?
Do you want the truth or do you really just want to keep hating President George Bush?
2007-01-24 07:30:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by jesuscuresislam 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
If we decide to leave Iraq, are we prepared to accept the refugees like those in Vietnam?
I PRAY not!
Many more "moles" will then be part of the North American society.
2007-01-24 07:09:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by whynotaskdon 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ultimately, we have an ethical duty to clean up the mess we made... none of this would have happened if the Bush Administration hadn't messed up with the planning effort and the actual implementation of the war. Even better, maybe the administration should have been more thorough with its intel and focused on Iran.
2007-01-24 07:11:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Treebeard 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
And what could their concept of victory be? Occupying Iraq till the top of time? they might desire to have an interest by installation the Iraq government and militia so as that they are adequate adequate to be self reliant, and able to preserving order as quickly as we do elect to pass away. we ought to constantly have an interest by pulling out as quickly as a danger, because of the fact each and every 2d we stay over there is purely straining our economic gadget and prosperity further than it already has been. no matter what, 'dropping the conflict' is purely an expression that doesn't carry any value to it. understand that to lose a conflict, you ought to formally declare defeat to a distinctive u . s . a ., and in doing so which you ought to sign a rfile itemizing the words of renounce. so a techniques as i comprehend, u.s. has on no account signed a term of renounce, in spite of the undeniable fact that we did negotiate with the NVA, and that they ended up nullifying the settlement as quickly as we began mass troop withdrawal. We shouldn't take that direction, yet we ought to constantly attempt to do what we did in Korea if in any respect a danger. in spite of the undeniable fact that technically the Korean conflict on no account ended, a end hearth became made. To on the present time, South Korea nevertheless keeps to be a solid best pal and is self-adequate by ability of itself. If there is something on hand out of this conflict, it could be comparable to what we did in Korea, no longer Vietnam.
2016-11-01 04:33:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We must get out immediately. They do not want us there anyway. The middle east has a tribal mentality. They will always fight. Yes, we should open our borders to refugees.
2007-01-24 07:12:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
We're going to win and let Iraq take care of their own people.
2007-01-24 07:09:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by kingstubborn 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
vietnam was a differant situation the north vietnamese were out to kill and destroy
2007-01-24 07:11:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I find you to be ill informed, mistaken and not up on current affairs.
2007-01-24 07:21:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
God I hope not. Katrina victims were bad enough
2007-01-24 07:13:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sean 5
·
0⤊
1⤋