Hypothetically speaking (because they wouldn't let you on a plane if you were that heavily pregnant!) I believe yes, such a child could ultimately claim dual-nationality.
It may be that whereas you would be a British CITIZEN, your child would merely be a British SUBJECT - for which legally speaking, there is a bit of difference and would mean that they wouldn't necessarily have the right of abode in the UK.
Hypothetically speaking, I suggest you contact the British Embassy at the time you register any hypothetical birth and see what your options are and what nationality the child is entitled to. It should be both. Hypothetically speaking again though, it is better for a traveller to hold a UK passport than an Australian one.
2007-01-24 04:00:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mental Mickey 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. The baby would be a UK citizen and need a temporary UK passport issuing by the British Embassy in Australia. If it had an Aus passport then it would be an Aus citizen and as such you would have to fill in immigration forms for your baby to live in the UK.
2007-01-24 03:53:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by monkeymanelvis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes. Because, he or she is born in Australia. Automatically, the baby has an Australian nationality. So, an Australian passport. I think....if there is another possibility, i don't know.
2007-01-24 03:54:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by kaloo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm particularly particular Turkey has a rule of soil like France, so i think of your infant could be Turkish. yet why do you elect Turkish citizenship in case you already British citizenship be hollo?
2016-12-12 19:18:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it would be dyslexic like you!
2007-01-24 03:52:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋