It was a persuasive argument until chaos theory came along.
2007-01-24 02:23:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Only stupid people.
They're no loss. Let's save the smart people for atheism.
Besides after Darwin NOBODY can say 'anything that looks complex and designed must have been created from scratch' - afterall we're highly imperfect - our eyes are constructed badly its like a digital camera with a circuit board in front of the sensor, the faulty genes for creating vitamin C, the useless appendix, the wasteful diversion of the vas deferens... If we were designed you'd have to conclude God was stupid - and if his creations were really that pathetic, I don't think he'd be entitled to worship in the first place.
Also those religions morons always going on about how perfectly god made us - well I have to wear contacts - so if there is a god the first thing I do when I meet him is gonna be to punch his lights out for 'designing' me so badly!
2007-01-24 10:18:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by TRITHEMIUS 3
·
7⤊
0⤋
I have to say that when you study the evolution of the eye, it can be difficult to imagine it happening through a series of mutations.
I remember very well the freshman bio lecture when occular evolution was discussed. I walked out sort thinking 'there has to be a god'. It was only later in my studies that I understood that because of the extreme advantage conferred by sight, it would have been an area of intense evolutionary pressure and therefore it is extremely unlikely that any progressiosn through the evoltuionary process wouldhave been lost.
2007-01-24 10:27:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by mullah robertson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course not. Christians use reasons that Christians would believe to try to convert atheists. It doesn't have to be a Rocket Scientist to understand why that's a really dumb strategy.
2007-01-24 10:26:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by gelfling 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
In truth, apart from the Spirit of god it is impossible to raise the dead to life, you don't become a Christian by merely agreeing to a set of doctrines.
2007-01-24 10:23:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by james p 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, but it solidifies your faith. Just name one part of evolution, not adaptation or breeding that is true, and I'll prove you wrong.
2007-01-24 10:25:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by bacha2_33461 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Do you realize how inprobable the Big Bang is.
2007-01-24 10:24:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by TULSA 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
wtf, that to me makes absolutely no sense...
i do not see why a "creator" has to make something just cause it's complex
2007-01-24 10:20:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shellular Kellular 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm sure it has, unfortunately.
2007-01-24 10:21:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋