different breeds disprove evolution or explains creation.whats your thoughts?

Question

god made two dogs male and female.one a great dane the other a german shepard.
their puppies were great shepards mix and german danes mix.not a new creation a new breed.
then they mated their pupies were great shepard danes mix and german danes shepards mix.not a new creation a new breed.
then their puppies were great shepard danes german danes shepards mix and german danes shepards great shepard danes mix.not a new creation a new breed.
does this logic disprove evolution or creation?

What is logic? For our purpose we might say that logic is the science of correct thinking or sound reasoning. It imparts understanding because it is the means by which a subject is explained in its connected parts. Logic shows why they act and belong together. The development is coherent if its reasoning follows a gradual growth in such a way that all parts are united in sequence. A logical development may be in order of importance, in chronological order or one going from problem to solution, to mention a few possibilities

Answer 1

No, it proves nothing, one way or another.

Sexual recombination of the genome is an imporant factor in evolution, but it is not by any means the only one. Perhaps the biggest factor in the evolution of new species is the long slow passage of time. Homo Sapiens is about 200 thousand years old. Very few people have any real appreciation for how long that span of time is. The first primitive forms of "life" happened over 3 billion years ago. That span of time is far beyond most people's comprehension.

Answer 2

If cross breeding "disproved evolution" then we'd have a lot of content scientists right now rather than those trying to fathom the complexities behind it.

Additionally, your first assumption is off:

"god made two dogs male and female.one a great dane the other a german shepard."

God didn't make these dogs, they were engineered by humans using selective breeding methods. They are all cross breeds in a sense as they all came about from mixing different breeds, only when man became happy with his development did he name it and continue to breed together only those of that specific breed to homogenise them.

Answer 3

No, since the example ignores the genetic basis of inheritance. Some in the second generation will be very much like great Danes and some like German shepards. It is a basic hybrid cross.

Answer 4

They are still the same species, which is why they can breed. They are canines, not cats, bears, or seals. They are cross breeds, not new created species. So it proves Creation, not cross-species evolution.

See, that is where the problem is. People think one species evolves into another. Not so. Speciation just means development of the species (singular), not creation of new species (plural). It is a quirp of the word "species" that it can be singular or plural, but a dog is still a dog. A grass is still a grass. And a fly is still a fly. Speciation has not created any new species, only new varieties of the same old species.

H

Answer 5

New breeds? Is that POSSIBLE!

That's not evolution.

Evolution SPECIFICALLY requires NO WILLFUL INTENT.

Breeding is NOT evolution. It's using scientific GENETICS to achieve a result. It's CREATIONISM!

Evolution occurs with NO HELP

Evolution is a "throw of the dice" made by NATURE not MAN.

Answer 6

Being able to make changes within dogs that start to show separation is proof of evolution. Change is change, and that is exactly what happens when things evolve.

Answer 7

Common sense, science, and logic all disprove creationism.

Answer 8

Dogs are evolved from wolves, not from other random dogs.

While your thought game regarding inbreeding is admirable, multiply this a few million times.

Answer 9

Disproved creation since he didn't create a chow

Answer 10

Logic cannot prove anything that is not in the premises.