Shouldn't the people who have strong feelings of support for Bush and the war in Iraq be the first ones to serve instead of others who have to go for the 2 or 3 tour?
2007-01-23 13:24:50 · 18 answers · asked by me 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Well haha that's a great notion. But seriously, we keep a ready force (active duty) and inactive force (reserves). These are the peoples who should fight the wars period.
2007-01-23 13:28:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
At this point it is hard to say whether more troops are or are not necessary in Iraq. Personally, I think that the first thing we should do is remove the current admistration leaders in an effort to show the International community that we do not hold with unilateral action from any government. In that way we may be able to regain international support and help with Iraq and minimize some of the anti-America sentiment in the world today.
Peace!
2007-01-23 21:32:47 · answer #2 · answered by carole 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hindsight (or foresight if you were paying attention) said we should have went in heavy, and with a lot of unit commanders that speak arabic in the first place. We should have disarmed the populace and rebuilt and got the heck out of there.
And that's IF we went in, and it wasn't imperative that we do so. But 9/11 gave the Administration a window of opportunity to fan the flames of hysteria and do something they had been wanting to try, and they did it the way they wanted to do it and forced anybody who spoke up against it into retirement.
So here it is. A mess. Now we're just trying to figure out if it can be made to be less of a mess. In the end, we'll leave a mess and have a bunch of coalition collaborators we need to help find new homes.
2007-01-23 21:32:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It`s easy to be a strong supporter when you are sitting in a lazy boy sofa at home with a beer in your hand watching your big screen TV. I agree send the fanatical supporters and see how they enjoy 1 year in Iraq.
2007-01-23 21:31:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's just my opinion, but I think the first two people we should send are the Bush twins. It W had his kids in Iraq, this war would come to a speedy end.
2007-01-23 21:30:27 · answer #5 · answered by Goofy Foot 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Here's what's REALLY going on with Iraq!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
2007-01-24 10:36:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they should but it don't work like that. you have the same people returning to Iraq that don't really wont to be there or agree with the war. its time to pull the troops out. just give a big o thanks to all the stupid a** people who voted for him. WAY TO GO.
2007-01-23 21:31:38 · answer #7 · answered by ITS ME 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you know what I d=== ready,, lets do even better ,,lets get all the people that elected bush and make one country and let all you crying libs pick what you can and have your country
that way WE can have BUSH again for our president
2007-01-23 21:32:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We do not need more troops we need to slowly pull out, we went over there to restore a government for the people, we have done that, so lets leave.
2007-01-23 21:28:47 · answer #9 · answered by attax321 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I have been Twice and if I have to will go back again. Not that I want to but it's what I get paid to do.
2007-01-23 21:30:13 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋