Is Evolutionist a word? Is Evolution a religion?

Question

Maybe i'm seeing things then
http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/EVOLUTIONIST
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&lr=&defl=en&q=define:Evolutionists&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title

Religion
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&lr=&defl=en&q=define:religion&sa=X&oi=glossary_definition&ct=title

Evolution believes in Mutations and natural selection... is that believing in Super Natural beings like X-Men:p?

Good mutations anyone one seen any... moths? After the industrialization in England (with all the polution) they changed colour... that's evolution?
So maybe M.J. evolved into a new species of human being, or black people evolved to white people... or maybe white people evolved to black... interesting...
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-intro-to-biology.html
Why did Darwin call his book Origin of Species and never told us their origin, or did he? (This one i'm just not shore)

Answer 1

Evolution is not a religion.

Evolutionist is a word.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtEyYv.10Uc8pxSVOT4tKePsy6IX?qid=20070123160757AA5TCdN

Putting -ist on the end of something does NOT turn it into a religion. Guitarist? Rationalist? Hypnotist? There has to be a word for someone who is a proponent of the theory of evolution. It doesn't matter if some hairy-palmed Southern Baptist preacher says it makes it sound like a religion. It don't make it so.

Answer 2

It is not a religion. It is an accepted theory in the scientific community. Churchies hate it because it uncovers hypocrisy in several religious books. Religions on the other hand are not theories. Theories require logic, and religions have too little to qualify. Religions are somewhere above fairy tales and below theories.

Other theories and science disciplines that churchies don't like include:
Big Bang
String Theory
Genetic Engineering
Carbon Dating
Pre-biblical archeology
Paleontology
Cryostasis
Closed state Oscillating Universe Theory

Answer 3

No. Religion by definition is a belief in 1 god or many. A God is a supernatural being which science is unable to test and prove whenever it wants to.

Evolution does serve however as a cornerstone of faith for those who do not believe in God. It is the only explanation of how they could have gotten here without the assistance of an omnipotetent being.

Answer 4

Fail. "all the evidence delivered by ability of scientists are purely suppositions" Blatant lie. evidence submitted isn't based in any respect on suppositions. "I even have an IQ of 143" Woop-de-doo. All that shows is which you're an fool with a intense IQ ;) actual, you need to be mendacity. in case you had a intense IQ you would be ready to on account that evolution isn't a faith. "Micro-evolution is declared as version" it is sort of like arguing semantics, different than microevolution is purely small scale genetic transformations interior of a inhabitants, no longer inevitably adapting to the ambience. Sexual determination might reason microevolution, working example. "this is the end results of activation of genes that are already interior the chromosomes" And your foundation for this opinion is what precisely? "once you assert birds progressed from reptiles you do no longer show something" there is evidence to back up this declare alongside with comparative morphology in living and ancestral species and genetic. lots interior a similar way evidence is there to back up the declare that human beings are descended from a similar primate ancestors as chimpanzees and different large apes. "i could say the automobile progressed from a bicycle, because of the fact they have similarities" automobiles and bicycles do no longer reproduce, living organisms reproduce utilising a storage medium it particularly is suseptable to blunders. The evaluation is stupid. "i comprehend what i'm talking approximately" unusual, you look to renowned sh*t all approximately it. "it does not advise it did no longer exist formerly in this is DNA" Are you announcing that the genome of micro organism that produce nylonase, that have been shown (ie: recreated in a lab environment) to have gained the genes by an blunders, have been actual designed to have that capacity blunders? returned, you do no longer comprehend sh*t all approximately it. "each and every canine in the international has a similar style of chromosomes" Uh, and? they are all a similar species, this isn't any marvel they do. Horses and zebras can breed in spite of having a large difference in chromosome selection and easily produce sterile offspring. there is little doubt that the two are appropriate by ancestry although, and it is ordinarily sponsored up with further genetic and fossil evidence. i actually do no longer comprehend once you're a troll or purely dumb. pondering the quantity of blatant lies right here i'm guessing you're purely a creationists attempting to sound clever. ;) returned, fail.

Answer 5

Evolution is theory. A scientific theory. Not a religion. It explains things scientifically, something that reigion does not do. Religion controls, Evolution only explains. Evolution can be taught in schools because it is falseifiable (meaning it's backed up with actual evidence). Evolution carries more justification in my mind than Religion because it backed up with evidence. They have found no proof of anything religious.

Answer 6

Evolutionist is NOT a word and Evolution is NOT a religion. Only the religious try to make that declaration out of desperation and an attempt to annoy.

Answer 7

Evolutionism is NOT a religion. it's a scientific theory. Many scientists still believe in God (Catholics, Muslims, Protestants, etc.), but obviously don't believe in creationism.

Answer 8

There's a difference between a THEORY & a religion.A THEORY has FACTS to back it.A religon is based on faith(blind obedience).

Answer 9

I would say evolutionist is probably a word, but I don't like it.

Evolution is NOT a religion. And while I'm at it...neither is atheism.

Answer 10

It's not a religion, I believe in evolution and a God.