If we wouldn't have killed 38 million of our citizens, then the government wouldn't have an excuse to import slaves to do work U.S. citizen WILL do. How would it have changed U.S. immigration policies if we didn't abort 38 million of our citizens??
2007-01-23 12:14:25 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Don't start this,I thought you went away with your rants about abortion.Its none of your business what women do with their bodies.If the men who fathered theses baby's would step up to their responsibility then perhaps different choices would be made.Plus provide a link to your numbers .I think its false inflated numbers.
Freakonomics, I loved that book. What a brilliant take on the worlds problems.Well at least in 20 yrs or so we wont have a surge in crime.
2007-01-23 12:20:17 · answer #1 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
don't think all those abortions came from u.s. parents. so many immigrants commit abortion too. in any case, abortion, although seen by many to be inhumane, is still a freedom of choice that women have the right to exercise. furthermore, think of so many kids coming into the world without a father or so many of them coming into a life where they won't be able to be taken care of the right way to be given a loving home, a good education, or even the basic necessity of food, clothing or shelter because so many single persons can't even take care of themselves much less take care of another young one. the problem does not stem from the abortion, it stems from our inability to be responsible and using contraceptive measures so as not to be put in this situation. guess you are a guy like myself so we don't know or understand how so many mothers regret what they have done once they have had an abortion, or the fact that they will have to live with that guilt for the rest of their lives.
2007-01-24 00:45:59 · answer #2 · answered by osito 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree.
We need to get our leaders to compromise. The far right insists on a perfect law that stops all abortions. By refusing to compromise they allowed another 1.3 million babies to die last year.
Compromise!!! Save some of the babies at least!
Most agree to allow abortions if the woman was raped or in cases of incest. It's true that even those babies are innocent, but by trying to stop all abortions it's causing that none of the abortions are being outlawed.
I happen to believe that we should have compassion on rape victims and not make them suffer the torture of a nine month reminder of the crime. It would be better if the woman could come to realize that the baby is hers, and not the criminal's.
Most agree to the compromise of allowing abortions in the first three months, but not in the last 3 months. Ones in between would need a good reason why they couldn't get it done sooner.
It's not a perfect answer, but it would save some lives that are not being saved today because of stubborness.
2007-01-23 20:31:02 · answer #3 · answered by Steve S 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually, legalized abortion is responsible for the significant drop in violent crime. Seriously. Read Freakonomics. Considering today's unemployment and poverty statistics, most of those aborted embryos (not even fetuses yet, let alone infants - check your scientific terminology) would have ended up in prison, victims of violent crime, or on welfare. You don't quote the source of your statistics, but I find them highly suspect. However, I'm not in the mood to look up the correct numbers.
And, since you're apparently oblivious on other counts as well, the US doesn't "import slaves." Slavery was abolished quite some time ago. Immigrants come to this country of their own volition for a number of reasons. Chances are your ancestors immigrated to this country. Our policies are less liberal than those of many other countries, including the UK.
2007-01-23 20:32:22 · answer #4 · answered by fyrfly 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
how many has china killed ? or any other country for that matter i don't know its all messed up i guess mexico will have to import young people from Guatemala as so many young mexicans are coming here ,and the president of mexico is offering incentives to companies to raise wages so their young will stay in mexico .they will have a nation of old people left kinda funny though its one of the defense ploys the illegals and pros use kinda redundant don't you think ? what if mexico took care of their own people they are not a poor country ? How would it have changed U.S. immigration policies ?
2007-01-23 20:25:21 · answer #5 · answered by hayleylov 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Ok so as a US citizen...would YOU put a roof on a house in the sweltering heat for 100 bucks a day?...OOOOH YOU WOULD!!!!
Would you clean someones house for 70 dollars a week? OOOH YOU WOULD DO THAT TO??? So there ARE americans who will do jobs like this!!!???
Gimme a break...who are you kidding...not one college educated citizen would take odd jobs like that so climb of your pedestal and get back to reality...
2007-01-23 23:26:04 · answer #6 · answered by Jujuchi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a good portion of these children's would grow up as criminals and would have jail cells as home addresses. There already is plenty of trash that we call adults and parents raping and destroying the lives of these unwanted births. I suggest those who are against abortion, that they start adopting a lot of kids.
2007-01-23 22:37:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
first of all, you are not a US citizen until you are born on American soil and second, how many unwanted children have you adopted. I'm going to guess none. So if your figures are correct that is 38,000,000 more burdens to society, how many were you planning to feed. None and I bet you already think you pay too many taxes.
2007-01-23 20:54:16 · answer #8 · answered by foreverquilting2003 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You've hit the nail on the head with this one!
This is the exact reason our Government is allowing so many illegals to enter the United States.
Liberals will scream over this answer but it is based on the science of 'population dynamics'.
Due to abortion (mainly) we have reduced our nation's population by 30,000,000 individuals and have create a 'population vacuum'.
Our current societal structure can not support itself, (and our way of life therefore), with out this base of new births.
Curious catch 22 to the women's movement wouldn't you say?
2007-01-23 20:34:29 · answer #9 · answered by socal pal 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Read the book Freakonomics. It delves in to the connection between crime and abortion.
2007-01-23 20:24:19 · answer #10 · answered by iLLegal Mexican 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋